Industrial Fault Localization Using Variable Perturbation Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial manufacturing plants face challenges in accurately identifying the root cause of faults due to nonlinear interactions among process variables and nonstationary behavior, leading to inefficiencies and unplanned downtime.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing multivariate time-series data, soft-sensors, and a multi-level variable perturbation approach to identify dominant variables contributing to faults, employing hardware processors for data preprocessing, fault analysis, and localization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional fault detection techniques are used, then fault detection capability is provided, but fault localization precision deteriorates due to nonlinear interactions among process variables

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault localization precisionVSAvoidmodeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex fault localization problem into multiple hierarchical levels: (1) fault detection level using residual analysis, (2) fault isolation level using directed graphs and cut-sets, and (3) root cause identification level using variable perturbation. This segmentation allows each level to handle specific aspects of the problem independently, reducing overall modeling complexity while maintaining localization precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces soft sensors as intermediary components that bridge the gap between raw process measurements and fault analysis. These soft sensors compute unmeasured or difficult-to-measure variables based on available measurements, thereby simplifying the fault localization process without sacrificing precision by acting as mediators between the complex process system and the diagnostic algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive monitoring of all components is implemented, then fault detection capability improves, but system complexity and computational burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and focuses only on the critical variables and components that significantly contribute to fault occurrence using the directed graph model and cut-set analysis. Instead of comprehensively monitoring all components equally, the system identifies and extracts the minimal set of critical variables that, when monitored, provide sufficient fault detection capability while reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different monitoring intensities and analytical methods to different parts of the system based on their fault criticality. Critical components identified through cut-set analysis receive enhanced monitoring and more sophisticated diagnostic algorithms, while less critical components use simpler monitoring approaches, thereby optimizing the balance between reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If detailed analysis of all process variables is performed, then root cause identification accuracy improves, but computational time and resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroot cause identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-computing the directed graph model, identifying cut-sets, and determining critical variables before actual fault occurrence. This preliminary structuring of the analysis framework allows the system to quickly localize faults and identify root causes when faults occur, without performing exhaustive analysis of all variables in real-time, thereby reducing computational time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing detailed analysis only on the subset of variables identified as critical through the directed graph and cut-set analysis, rather than analyzing all process variables equally. This selective approach concentrates computational resources on the most relevant variables, achieving high root cause identification accuracy with reduced computational time and resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12596356B2Method and system for localization of faults in an industrial manufacturing plant
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US12596356B2 patent drawing
  • US12596356B2 patent drawing
  • US12596356B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Existing systems for fault detection and classification have the disadvantage that they have limited or no capability for fault localization and root cause identification, probably due to the challenges associated with modeling the nonlinear interactions among process variables and capturing the nonstationary behavior that is typical of most industrial processes. The disclosure herein generally relates to industrial manufacturing systems, and, more particularly, to method and system for localization of faults in an industrial manufacturing plant. The system uses a perturbation based approach for fault localization, in which the system determines variables having dominant effect on identified faults, in terms of a perturbation score calculated for each of the variables.