Fault Prediction System Using Dynamic Reference Time Points

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fault prediction systems face limitations in accurately predicting fault occurrences due to variations in the periods between symptom onset and actual fault events, leading to reduced prediction precision.

Innovation Solution

A fault predicting system that adjusts reference time points and prediction target periods based on predetermined length settings, using machine learning to generate a fault prediction model with feature quantities from operation log information and fault index values, allowing for more precise symptom sensing and prediction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If operation logs are partially retrieved with uniform temporal differences prior to fault occurrences, then the fault prediction system can be simplified, but the prediction precision deteriorates because the operation logs do not necessarily include symptoms of faults

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault prediction system complexityVSAvoidfault prediction precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the log retrieval period variable rather than uniform. The control unit dynamically adjusts the retrieval period based on the specific fault type and its characteristics, allowing the system to adapt to different fault patterns while maintaining prediction precision without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the temporal parameter (retrieval period length) based on fault type. By adjusting this parameter dynamically according to fault characteristics, the system retrieves logs that actually contain fault symptoms, thereby improving prediction precision while managing system complexity through parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the retrieval period is extended to ensure inclusion of fault symptoms, then the prediction precision improves, but the data processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault prediction precisionVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the retrieval period parameter to be just long enough to capture fault symptoms for each specific fault type. This prevents unnecessary extension of the retrieval period, thereby maintaining prediction precision while minimizing data processing time and computational load

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If different retrieval periods are used for different fault types, then the prediction precision improves, but the system complexity increases due to need for fault-type-specific parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault prediction precisionVSAvoidparameter management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal control unit that handles multiple fault types by selecting appropriate retrieval periods based on fault type identification. This multi-functional approach allows the system to manage different retrieval periods through a single centralized component, improving prediction precision while containing system complexity through unified control logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11403160B2Fault predicting system and fault prediction method
Publication Date: 2022.08.02 HITACHI LTD
  • US11403160B2 patent drawing
  • US11403160B2 patent drawing
  • US11403160B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A reference time point which is equivalent to a fault-prediction-execution time point is sequentially changed by setting, as a symptom sensing period, a period from a time point which is a predetermined first period-length before the reference time point until the reference time point, and by setting, as a prediction target period, a period from the reference time point until a time point which is a predetermined second period-length after the reference time point if a fault does not occur in the period from the reference time point until the time point which is the second period-length after the reference time point, and a period from the reference time point until a fault-occurrence time point if a fault occurs in the period from the reference time point until the time point which is the second period-length after the reference time point, and machine learning is performed by using, as an explanatory variable, a feature quantity based on the operation log information of the symptom sensing period, and using, as a response variable, a fault index value based on whether or not there is a particular-event occurrence in the operation log information corresponding to a fault occurrence in the fault record information of the prediction target period, and a period-length from the reference time point until the fault-occurrence time point.