Fault Prediction System for Electrical Distribution Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrical fault prediction systems rely on predetermined static thresholds, which are not predictive and only alert when a fault has already occurred, failing to provide early warning for potential issues in electrical distribution systems, leading to costly repairs and equipment damage from transient voltage surges.

Innovation Solution

A system that performs load analysis by monitoring electrical current, using Root Mean Square (RMS) values, power factor, Total Harmonic Distortion (THD), and standard deviation to establish unique operational boundaries and thresholds, enabling predictive analysis and automated alerts for potential faults before they occur, incorporating Power Quality Nodes (PQ-Nodes) and a multi-channel recorder for continuous monitoring and data analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If predetermined static thresholds are used for fault detection, then the system is simple to implement, but it cannot provide early warning and only alerts when a fault has already occurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault prediction capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes operational boundaries and thresholds through baseline profiling during normal operation before faults occur. This preliminary characterization of normal operational characteristics enables the system to predict potential faults by comparing real-time measurements against these pre-established boundaries, providing early warning rather than merely detecting faults after they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static predetermined thresholds to dynamic operational boundaries that are continuously updated based on actual operational data. The baseline profile adapts to changing operational conditions, allowing the system to maintain accurate fault prediction capabilities while accommodating variations in normal operation patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If continuous monitoring with multiple parameters is implemented, then early fault detection is enabled, but the system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses on specific key parameters (RMS current, power factor, THD) that are most indicative of fault conditions. Rather than monitoring all possible electrical parameters, the system identifies and monitors only the critical subset needed for effective fault prediction, simplifying the monitoring system while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system is designed to evaluate multiple parameters (current, power factor, THD) simultaneously using a unified baseline profiling approach. This multi-functional capability allows the system to detect various types of faults through a single integrated monitoring framework, reducing overall system complexity compared to separate monitoring systems for each parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If baseline profiling with multiple electrical parameters is used, then predictive analysis capability is improved, but the measurement and data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational boundary definitionVSAvoidparameter measurement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines the measurement and analysis of multiple electrical parameters (RMS current, power factor, THD) into a unified baseline profiling process. By merging these measurements and evaluating them collectively against established operational boundaries, the system achieves precise fault prediction while simplifying the measurement and data processing complexity compared to analyzing each parameter separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10488466B2Fault prediction system for electrical distribution systems and monitored loads
Publication Date: 2019.11.26 PARKIN PERRY
  • US10488466B2 patent drawing
  • US10488466B2 patent drawing
  • US10488466B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for fault prediction in electrical systems. It includes a network of recording nodes that transmit data to multi-channel recorder. The nodes monitor power quality based on a number of system parameters. These data are assembled into data blocks and are analyzed to determine load factors for the system over time. Data blocks are collected over 22 cycle periods and are evaluated against a derived standard deviation factor for the given system. The standard deviation is used to determine alert and alarm levels. The constant monitoring allows the system to alert workers of a potential upcoming fault in one or more system components. In this way repairs can be made before the component fails and the system experiences a fault condition.