Multi-Resolution Fault Prediction via Time-Scale Model Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fault prediction techniques for aircraft engines, which combine parametric and non-parametric data, still face challenges in accuracy and timing, often failing to detect faults sufficiently in advance, leading to maintenance disruptions and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes multiple models associated with different time scales, where features are selected and processed based on their respective time scales, and outputs are fused to generate a more accurate prediction of impending faults, allowing for earlier detection and scheduling of maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional fault prediction techniques combining parametric and non-parametric data are used, then some useful information is obtained, but the prediction accuracy and timing are insufficient, leading to late fault detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault prediction accuracyVSAvoidtime advance of fault detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fault prediction task into multiple models, each specialized for different time scales (e.g., short-term, medium-term, long-term predictions). This segmentation allows each model to optimize for specific temporal patterns, improving both accuracy and the timing of detections across different forecast horizons

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a multi-dimensional approach by evaluating data across multiple time scales simultaneously. Instead of single-time-point analysis, the system creates a temporal dimension with multiple resolution levels, allowing faults to be detected at optimal advance times based on their development patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multiple models with different time scales are used, then fault prediction accuracy and advance detection are improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault prediction reliabilityVSAvoidprediction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple specialized models into a unified multi-resolution classification system. By combining the outputs of different time-scale models through fusion techniques, the system achieves improved reliability while managing complexity through integrated architecture and coordinated model evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If faults are detected well in advance, then maintenance can be scheduled efficiently, but immediate maintenance actions may cause service disruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance scheduling efficiencyVSAvoidoperational disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic maintenance scheduling based on predicted fault timing and severity. The system adjusts maintenance plans according to the specific prediction outcomes, allowing flexible scheduling that optimizes efficiency while minimizing operational disruptions through adaptive decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8112368B2Method, apparatus and computer program product for predicting a fault utilizing multi-resolution classifier fusion
Publication Date: 2012.02.07 THE BOEING CO
  • US8112368B2 patent drawing
  • US8112368B2 patent drawing
  • US8112368B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus and computer program product are provided to predict faults. Initially, a plurality of features are provided to a plurality of models. A subset of features is selected for each model. The plurality of features selected by a respective model is dependent upon a time scale associated with a respective model. As a result of their dependence upon different time scales, the plurality of selected features provided to a first model will differ from those provided to a second model. The plurality of models process the respective plurality of selected features. The outputs from the plurality of models are fused to generate a measure indicative of an impending fault. By providing different selected features to the models that are dependent upon the associated time scales and by then combining the outputs of the plurality of models, the resulting measure of an impending fault may accurately predict a fault well in advance of its occurrence.