Fault Prediction System for Gas Turbine Machinery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial control systems for gas turbines lack effective predictive capabilities to anticipate and prevent system-level faults, leading to potential equipment damage and costly outages.

Innovation Solution

A fault prediction and protection system that analyzes data trends from machinery sensors to identify patterns indicative of potential faults, providing predictive alerts and proactive control measures to prevent turbine stalls and other issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional monitoring systems are used to detect faults, then the system structure remains simple, but the ability to predict future faults is insufficient leading to equipment damage and outages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault prediction capabilityVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of machinery data to identify patterns that indicate potential future faults before they actually occur. The processor analyzes trends in machinery measurements and generates fault predictions in advance, enabling proactive maintenance actions to be taken before equipment failure happens, thus improving reliability without requiring overly complex real-time intervention mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The fault prediction system is segmented into distinct functional modules: data acquisition from machinery sensors, trend analysis engine, pattern recognition algorithms, and alert generation components. This modular segmentation allows the complex prediction functionality to be built from manageable components, making the system structure organized and maintainable while achieving advanced fault prediction capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If reactive maintenance is performed after faults occur, then the maintenance process is simple, but equipment downtime and operational losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational continuityVSAvoidequipment downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of fault patterns by continuously analyzing machinery measurement trends and comparing them against known failure patterns. When potential faults are detected, the system generates advance alerts that enable maintenance teams to schedule repairs during planned downtime rather than experiencing unexpected equipment failures, thereby reducing operational losses and improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where machinery performance data is continuously collected, analyzed for predictive patterns, and used to generate maintenance alerts. This feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from historical fault data and improve its prediction accuracy over time, allowing for increasingly precise scheduling of maintenance activities that minimize operational disruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10037026B2Systems and methods for fault analysis
Publication Date: 2018.07.31 GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC
  • US10037026B2 patent drawing
  • US10037026B2 patent drawing
  • US10037026B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, includes machinery; and a protection monitoring system, comprising a processor configured to: analyze a trend of one or more data measurements of the machinery for one or more patterns indicative of a potential future fault within the machinery in the trend; and provide a fault prediction based upon the analysis of the trend.