Fault Case Retrieval Using Graded Component Keyword Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

NLP-based fault case retrieval systems often return historical faults that are similar in language description but not closely correlated in actual technology, leading to inaccurate retrieval results.

Innovation Solution

Predefining keywords classified into different grades to determine faults correlated in the actual technology, with higher-grade identical system components indicating higher similarity, and filtering out faults with no identical system components across all grades.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If NLP-based similarity comparison is used to retrieve historical faults, then the retrieval process is simple and fast, but the retrieval accuracy deteriorates because language similarity does not guarantee actual technology correlation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault retrieval speedVSAvoidfault retrieval accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fault description into structured fields (fault phenomenon, fault cause, fault solution) and extracts keywords from each field. This segmentation allows the system to compare specific technical components rather than performing blanket NLP similarity comparisons, thereby improving accuracy while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary keyword extraction and matching mechanism between the NLP-based retrieval system and the actual technology correlation requirement. By extracting standardized keywords from structured fields and comparing these intermediaries, the system bridges the gap between language similarity and technical correlation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If keyword-based technical correlation analysis is performed to improve retrieval accuracy, then the retrieval precision improves, but the processing complexity increases due to multiple analysis steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault retrieval accuracyVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-structuring fault data into standardized fields (fault phenomenon, fault cause, fault solution) and pre-extracting keywords during data entry. This preliminary structuring eliminates the need for complex real-time analysis, as the keywords and structured fields are already prepared for direct comparison during retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation from continuous NLP similarity scores to discrete keyword matching results. By converting the comparison task into counting identical keywords across structured fields, the system simplifies the processing logic while maintaining high retrieval accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If only language description similarity is considered, then the retrieval process is straightforward, but the retrieved faults are not correlated in actual technology

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretrieval process simplicityVSAvoidtechnical correlation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by focusing comparison on specific local fields (fault phenomenon, fault cause, fault solution) rather than treating the entire text as a uniform block. By extracting and comparing keywords from each localized field separately, the system ensures that technical correlation is assessed in relevant contexts, improving reliability while keeping the process manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11907057B2Fault processing method and system
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 SIEMENS AG
  • US11907057B2 patent drawing
  • US11907057B2 patent drawing
  • US11907057B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the teachings herein include a fault processing method comprising: receiving two historical faults similar to a target fault; searching keywords in a description of the target fault and each historical fault, wherein the keywords are classified into N grades, and for each system component in a grade, the grade comprises at least one keyword for describing the component, wherein N is an integer no less than 2; for each of the N grades, counting a quantity of identical system components represented by the keywords in the text description of each historical fault and the target fault; and comparing a degree of similarity of each historical fault to the target fault according to the quantity of identical system components counted in each grade of the N different grades, wherein a historical fault relating to a larger number of high-grade identical system components has a higher degree of similarity to the target fault.