Fault-Tolerant Lateral Waypoint Sequencing in Flight Management Computers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current flight management systems lack fault tolerance in lateral waypoint sequencing, particularly for Required Navigation Performance (RNP) operations with restrictions ≤ 0.3 NM, which requires significant training for flight crews and is incompatible with independent detection and control of leg sequencing operations.

Innovation Solution

A fault-tolerant lateral waypoint sequencing system that includes at least two flight management computers, where each computer implements processing operations associated with lateral leg sequencing and initiates actions if the other computer fails to acknowledge sequencing conditions within a predetermined time, ensuring independent operation and synchronization for precise aircraft path control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a traditional redundant FMS with a single queue of events managed by one master FMC is used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates because errors in the master FMC can be propagated to other FMCs without independent detection

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveFMS structure complexityVSAvoidfault tolerance in lateral waypoint sequencing
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized event queue management into separate, independent event queues in each FMC. Each FMC independently manages its own queue of sequencing events rather than relying on a single master FMC, thereby segmenting the control function to prevent error propagation and improve fault tolerance while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If independent detection and control of leg sequencing operations is implemented, then reliability improves through fault tolerance, but device complexity increases due to multiple FMCs requiring synchronization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault tolerance in lateral waypoint sequencingVSAvoidFMC synchronization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where each FMC monitors whether the other FMC has processed the same sequencing event by checking for corresponding events in their respective queues. This feedback loop enables independent detection of processing status and automatic synchronization without complex external control, resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If RNP restrictions of ≤ 0.3 NM are enforced without independent FMC detection, then manufacturing precision requirements are reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to inability to provide adequate guidance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance precision for RNP operationsVSAvoidguidance reliability for RNP ≤ 0.3 NM
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary independent detection and verification of sequencing conditions in each FMC before executing leg sequencing. By pre-checking whether sequencing conditions are met independently in both FMCs and synchronizing their event queues, the system ensures reliable guidance for high-precision RNP operations without requiring excessive manufacturing precision tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2818956B1Fault tolerant lateral waypoint sequencing system and method
Publication Date: 2019.03.06 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP2818956B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2818956B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2818956B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

Fault-tolerant lateral waypoint sequencing is provided for a system that includes at least a first flight management computer and a second flight management computer. A processing operation associated with lateral leg sequencing of an aircraft flight plan is implemented in the flight management computers. A determination is made in the first flight management computer as to whether the first flight management computer has received, within a predetermined period of time from when the first flight management computer implemented the processing operation, a notification from the second flight management computer that the second flight has also implemented the processing operation. An action is initiated in the first flight management computer when the first flight management computer has not received the notification from the second flight management computer within the predetermined period of time.