Fault-Tolerant Electric Machine with Four-Phase Stator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fault-tolerant designs for electric machines in aerospace applications often result in overrating in terms of power, weight, and installation volume, and complexity, particularly in more electric engines and aircraft systems, where single fault-tolerance is required but at the expense of increased capacity and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A fault-tolerant radial flux rotary electric machine with a permanent magnet rotor and an alternate-wound stator featuring four independent electrical phases, optimized tooth geometry, and a cooling scheme, utilizing a transposed conductor to reduce eddy currents and enhance fault tolerance, allowing for reduced overrating and complexity while maintaining operational reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If two individual starter-generator devices are installed per engine with each connected at a respective pad on the accessory gearbox, then single fault-tolerance is achieved, but installation volume and complexity increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle fault-toleranceVSAvoidinstallation volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Two starter-generator devices are packaged with a common housing and share a common shaft, reducing installation volume while maintaining single fault-tolerance through duplexing of electrical components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The common mechanical parts (housing, shaft) serve both starter-generator devices, allowing the system to perform multiple functions with shared infrastructure, reducing overall installation volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If two individual starter-generator devices are installed per engine with each connected at a respective pad on the accessory gearbox, then single fault-tolerance is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle fault-toleranceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The common housing and shaft merge mechanical functions, reducing the number of separate mechanical assemblies and simplifying installation while maintaining electrical redundancy for fault-tolerance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If two starter-generators are packaged with a common housing and common shaft, then installation complexity is reduced, but electrical generation capacity is overrated by 100 percent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation complexityVSAvoidelectrical generation capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically reconfigures electrical connections based on operational mode (single-phase or two-phase operation), allowing optimal power utilization without permanent overrating while maintaining fault-tolerance capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Weight of moving object

If independent four-phase drive systems are used for aircraft fuel pump, then weight is reduced by limiting overrating to 33 percent, but drive system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectric machine weightVSAvoiddrive system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive system dynamically switches between single-phase and two-phase operation modes, reducing weight by limiting overrating to 33 percent while managing complexity through controlled electrical reconfiguration rather than permanent dual-system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves a substantial weight saving and reduced complexity while maintaining single fault-tolerance, enabling efficient and reliable operation in aerospace applications by distributing power across four phases, thereby minimizing the impact of a single phase failure.

Implementation Method 1

the stator comprises coils formed of a transposed conductor to reduce eddy currents

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Implementation Method 2

permanent magnet rotor having fourteen poles, and an alternate-wound stator having sixteen slots and four coil pairs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

the coils are formed so as to have a substantially parallelogram-shaped cross section, thereby providing a void with a substantially triangular cross section in each slot for flow of a cooling fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS11496010B2Electric machines
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • US11496010B2 patent drawing
  • US11496010B2 patent drawing
  • US11496010B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Fault-tolerant radial flux rotary electric machines are provided. One such machine comprises: a permanent magnet rotor having fourteen poles; and an alternate-wound stator having sixteen slots and four coil pairs, each coil pair forming part of one of four independent electrical phases.