FCC Unit Ethanol Co-Processing via Dual Reaction Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing processes for producing ethane from ethanol in fluidized catalytic cracking units (FCC) are inefficient due to seasonal price fluctuations of ethanol and inability to co-process ethanol with heavy hydrocarbons, leading to low capacity units and inadequate catalysts for meeting market demand for ethene.

Innovation Solution

A process where ethanol and hydrocarbon streams are introduced separately into two reaction zones of an FCC reactor, using a zeolite catalyst with specific conditions for dehydration and cracking, allowing for flexible operation and increased ethene production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If ethanol is processed alone in dedicated units, then ethene production can be maintained, but the units have low capacity and cannot meet market demand due to seasonal ethanol availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveethene production capacityVSAvoidflexibility to ethanol supply variations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The FCC unit is designed to perform multiple functions: processing both ethanol and heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks simultaneously. The catalyst system and reaction conditions are optimized to handle diverse feedstocks, allowing the unit to produce ethene from ethanol while also processing conventional petroleum feedstocks, thereby meeting market demand regardless of seasonal ethanol availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The process merges ethanol processing with heavy hydrocarbon cracking in a single FCC unit. Both feedstocks are introduced separately into reaction zones and processed simultaneously over the same catalyst system, combining the capabilities of dedicated ethanol units with conventional FCC operations to achieve high ethene production capacity and operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional catalysts are used for ethanol dehydration, then ethene can be produced, but heavy hydrocarbons cannot be co-processed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to co-process ethanol and heavy hydrocarbonsVSAvoidcatalyst performance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst system employs composite materials including zeolites (such as ZSM-5, beta, or Y zeolite) combined with other catalytic components. This composite structure provides both the dehydration activity needed for ethanol conversion and the cracking activity required for heavy hydrocarbon processing, enabling simultaneous co-processing of both feedstocks with consistent performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The catalyst is designed with different active sites or phases that perform different functions: one component facilitates ethanol dehydration while another handles heavy hydrocarbon cracking. This local differentiation of catalytic activity within the catalyst system allows simultaneous processing of both feedstocks with appropriate selectivity and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If ethanol and hydrocarbons are processed together in mixed feedstock, then unit operation is simplified, but ethene yield is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveethene yieldVSAvoidnumber of reaction zones
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The FCC unit is divided into separate reaction zones: a first reaction zone for ethanol dehydration and a second reaction zone for heavy hydrocarbon cracking. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized for its specific function, maximizing ethene yield from ethanol while simultaneously processing hydrocarbons, without the negative effects of mixed feedstock processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables flexible operation of FCC units, significantly increasing ethene yield and economic viability by utilizing the catalyst's heat for endothermic reactions, achieving 15-90 wt% ethene production in the fuel gas stream.

Implementation Method 1

the catalysts from the regenerator of the UFCC provide the heat for the ethanol dehydration reactions and the cracking of the hydrocarbons, which are both endothermic

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

Ethanol is dehydrated in a first reaction zone, under conditions of space velocity in the range 1000 to 4000 h-1

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

the cracking of the hydrocarbons, in a second reaction zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentEP1942089B1Process for converting ethanol and hydrocarbons in a fluidized catalytic cracking unit
Publication Date: 2024.07.24 PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA PETROBRAS
  • EP1942089B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

A method is described for co-processing of ethanol and hydrocarbons from petroleum refining, which are introduced separately in two reaction zones of a reactor of a fluidized catalytic cracking unit. The process combines conversion of ethanol into ethene and conversion of hydrocarbons into other lighter hydrocarbon fractions, to produce ethene in quantities of 15 to 90 wt% in the fuel gas fraction obtained during the process.