3D Model Reconstruction for Fused Deposition Modeling Cracking
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Consumer-grade 3D printers face issues with structural integrity and material waste when printing larger objects due to bending and cracking of thermoplastic material, particularly when printing long lines, as the cooling and contraction times of the material can lead to distortions and fractures.
Innovation Solution
The 3D model is reconstructed to break down long printable portions into shorter, independently printable segments, and the shell of the object is modified to include columnar structures or offset apertures, ensuring that each segment is within a threshold length to prevent structural failures during the fused deposition modeling process.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If long lines are printed in a single pass, then printing speed is improved, but structural integrity deteriorates due to bending and cracking from uneven cooling and contraction
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies segmentation by dividing long printable lines into multiple shorter segments. Instead of printing a continuous long line in a single pass, the printing path is broken into discrete segments with small gaps between them. This allows each segment to cool and contract independently, preventing the bending and cracking that occurs when entire long lines are printed continuously, thus maintaining structural integrity while still achieving reasonable printing efficiency.
2Reliability
If support structures are added to prevent cracking, then structural integrity is improved, but material waste increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies self-service by designing the object's own geometry to prevent cracking without requiring external support structures. By segmenting the printable paths and optimizing the printing sequence, the object's structure itself prevents the bending and cracking that would otherwise require support lattices or rafts. This eliminates the need for additional support material that would need to be printed and then removed, significantly reducing material waste while maintaining structural integrity.
3Reliability
If solid objects are printed instead of hollow, then structural integrity is improved, but printing time and material consumption increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by selectively applying segmentation and path optimization only to critical areas where cracking is likely to occur, rather than printing the entire object solid. The hollow structure is maintained in non-critical areas to preserve printing speed and reduce material consumption, while localized path segmentation is applied to specific shells or walls that are prone to bending and cracking during printing. This approach maintains structural integrity in critical regions without sacrificing overall printing efficiency.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach significantly reduces cracking, bending, and material waste by ensuring uniform cooling and bonding of thermoplastic layers, enhancing the structural integrity and aesthetic appeal of the printed objects without the need for additional support structures.
Implementation Method 1
Fused deposition modeling relies on an additive principle of melting and laying down a fast-cooling thermoplastic material
Implementation Method 2
When a melted thermoplastic material is printed, the material will contract as it cools
Data Source
AI summary
In various implementations, a computing device is configured to reconstruct a 3D model, such that reconstruction of the 3D model prevents the printing of long lines typically associated with cracking, bending, or decreased structural integrity of a 3D printed object based on the 3D model. In some implementations, a sliced 3D model is analyzed to determine that a structural characteristic of the 3D model is compatible for reconstruction. The 3D model is then reconstructed based on the determination that the 3D model is compatible. Other implementations analyze the 3D model to determine whether at least a portion of the 3D model shell has a seamless body. In this regard, the 3D model is reconstructed based on determining that the shell portion has a seamless body.


