Flight Data Recorder Scripting for Real-Time Alerts and Data Streaming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flight data recorders (FDRs) and Cockpit Voice and Data Recorders (CVDRs) currently store data without processing it, limiting real-time operational insights and requiring post-flight analysis, and there is a need for real-time data utilization and automated alerts.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a scripting engine within the FDR to analyze flight data, generate triggers, and initiate automated downloads to external devices for real-time monitoring and data processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If FDR stores data without processing, then data storage capacity is maintained, but real-time operational insights are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time operational insightsVSAvoiddata processing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of flight data by evaluating parameters against predefined thresholds during flight operations. The scripting engine continuously monitors flight parameters and pre-identifies exception conditions, preparing alert information before actual events occur. This allows real-time operational insights to be generated without requiring complex post-flight analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The FDR system serves itself by automatically monitoring its own recorded data and generating alerts when exception conditions are detected. The scripting engine within the FDR autonomously evaluates flight parameters and triggers alerts without requiring external processing systems, enabling the recorder to provide real-time operational insights while maintaining relatively simple architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If FDR processes data in real-time, then operational safety is enhanced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different processing intensities to different data parameters based on their importance. Critical safety parameters are continuously monitored with high processing intensity, while less critical parameters are evaluated at lower intensities or only when thresholds are approached. This selective processing approach enhances operational safety for critical functions while minimizing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The scripting engine evaluates flight parameters at periodic intervals rather than continuously processing all data streams. Exception conditions are checked at defined sampling rates, and alert generation occurs periodically when thresholds are exceeded. This periodic evaluation maintains operational safety monitoring while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Loss of time

If automated download is implemented, then data utilization timeliness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata utilization timelinessVSAvoidautomated download system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated download functionality is merged with the existing FDR architecture by integrating the scripting engine and alert generation capabilities into the recorder unit. The same hardware platform that stores flight data is also used to process and transmit alerts, eliminating the need for separate dedicated download devices and reducing overall system complexity while improving data utilization timeliness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The FDR system is designed to perform multiple functions using the same core components. The scripting engine both monitors flight parameters for safety alerts and manages the automated download of relevant data to external systems. This multi-functionality approach enables timely data utilization through automated download without requiring separate dedicated systems, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3864632B1Systems and methods for using flight data recorder data
Publication Date: 2026.01.14 L3HARRIS AVIATION PROD INC
  • EP3864632B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3864632B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3864632B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A flight data recorder (FDR) may include a script engine configured to run an algorithm in order to obtain, analyze and use FDR and Cockpit Voice and Data Recorder (CVDR) data for non-Technical Standard Orders (TSO) applications. The script engine may be configured, by the algorithm, to analyze flight data received by the FDR and use the flight data to output a trigger via an Ethernet port or an ARINC 429 output. The script engine may also analyze the flight data and stream at least a portion of the flight data via the Ethernet port or the ARINC port.