FEATS Model Temporal Feature Impact Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing predictive data analysis solutions lack interpretability and effectively preserve the multi-variate temporal structure of data, leading to difficulties in handling time-dependent and cross-variable relationships in predictive models.

Innovation Solution

The FEATS model employs feature attention heads to generate per-temporal feature time impact scores and attention head scores, preserving the multi-variate temporal structure by processing each temporal feature set over a customized time window without concatenation, and considers both time-dependent and time-independent features through transformation functions, allowing for parallel processing and reduced computational complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional predictive models are used, then predictive accuracy can be achieved, but interpretability and preservation of multi-variate temporal structure are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoidtemporal structure information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the temporal data into multiple time windows and processes each window separately through dedicated attention heads. This segmentation allows the model to preserve multi-variate temporal structure by analyzing specific time periods independently while maintaining overall predictive accuracy through aggregation of window-level predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a temporal dimension by processing data through multiple time windows and assigning temporal weights to different time points. This dimensional approach enables the model to capture time-dependent patterns and cross-variable relationships while maintaining interpretability through temporal feature importance scores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of information

If complex temporal processing is applied to preserve multi-variate temporal structure, then interpretability improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemporal structure preservationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the temporal data into discrete time windows and processing each through separate attention heads, the model reduces computational complexity compared to processing the entire temporal sequence simultaneously. Each attention head operates on a specific time window, enabling parallel processing and reducing overall computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies attention mechanisms selectively to specific time windows and variables rather than processing all data uniformly. This partial action approach allows the model to focus computational resources on the most relevant temporal patterns and variables, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining temporal structure preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If all temporal features are processed equally, then computational efficiency is maintained, but time-dependent relationships and cross-variable interactions are not captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidtime-dependent relationship capture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns different weights and processing intensities to different time windows and variables based on their local importance. Attention heads dynamically adjust the processing focus for each time window, allowing the model to capture time-dependent relationships and cross-variable interactions in regions where they are most significant while maintaining computational efficiency through selective processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The model dynamically adjusts the temporal weightings and attention distributions based on the input data characteristics and time window content. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to capture evolving time-dependent relationships and cross-variable interactions while maintaining computational efficiency through adaptive resource allocation rather than uniform processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20230419176A1Machine learning techniques for predictive multi-variate temporal feature impact determinations
Publication Date: 2023.12.28 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US20230419176A1 patent drawing
  • US20230419176A1 patent drawing
  • US20230419176A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer program products are disclosed for generating a predictive temporal feature impact report using a feature engineering machine with attention for time series (FEATS model). An example method includes receiving an entity input data object. The method further includes determining one or more attention head scores for each feature attention head included in the FEATS model based at least in part on one or more per-temporal feature time impact scores over each time window for each temporal feature set. The method further includes generating a predictive temporal feature impact report based at least in part on at least one of the one or more attention head scores for each attention head or the one or more per-temporal feature time impact scores for each temporal feature time point as determined in each attention head.