Feature Cue Presentation Hierarchy for User Onboarding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users are often overwhelmed or presented with irrelevant feature cues for product features, as existing technologies lack the ability to effectively organize and coordinate feature cues, leading to inefficient user engagement and satisfaction.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates feature cues using a template, determines eligibility based on user interaction and time thresholds, and organizes them in a presentation hierarchy using feature cue rules and user parameters to ensure relevant cues are displayed at optimal times, reducing user annoyance and increasing engagement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If multiple feature cues are presented simultaneously to users, then users are informed about available features, but users become overwhelmed and experience reduced engagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature information deliveryVSAvoiduser overload
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments feature cues into different priority levels and presents them sequentially rather than simultaneously. The scheduling component divides the delivery of multiple feature cues across different time periods, presenting high-priority cues first and lower-priority cues later, thereby preventing user overload while ensuring comprehensive feature information delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the presentation of feature cues based on user behavior and engagement metrics. The scheduling component monitors user interactions and adapts the timing and selection of feature cues in real-time, optimizing when to present each cue based on current user state rather than using a fixed presentation schedule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If feature cues are presented without filtering, then all features are communicated to users, but irrelevant cues are shown reducing user satisfaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature information completenessVSAvoidirrelevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary filtering and prioritization of feature cues before presentation. The scheduling component pre-processes the list of feature cues, evaluating their relevance to the user's current context, usage patterns, and engagement level, and prepares an optimized presentation sequence in advance, ensuring only relevant cues are presented at appropriate times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from user interactions to continuously refine which feature cues are presented. By monitoring user behavior, engagement metrics, and responses to previously presented cues, the scheduling component learns what features are relevant to each user and adjusts future cue presentations accordingly, eliminating irrelevant cues while maintaining information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If feature cues are presented in a haphazard manner, then implementation is simple, but related cues are not coordinated effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecue implementation simplicityVSAvoidcue coordination structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The scheduling component serves multiple functions within a single system element: it prioritizes feature cues, schedules their presentation timing, filters irrelevant cues, and coordinates related cues together. This multi-functional approach provides effective cue coordination without requiring separate complex systems for each function, maintaining implementation simplicity while achieving structured presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of information

If feature cues are presented without timing considerations, then all cues are delivered, but cues may be shown after features are well known

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature cue deliveryVSAvoidoptimal presentation timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic evaluation and presentation of feature cues based on user engagement metrics and usage patterns. Rather than presenting cues at fixed intervals or all at once, the scheduling component periodically assesses user interest and feature relevance, presenting cues at optimal moments when users are most likely to engage, thereby preventing both premature and delayed presentations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS10846748B2Onboarding feature cues
Publication Date: 2020.11.24 YAHOO AD TECH LLC
  • US10846748B2 patent drawing
  • US10846748B2 patent drawing
  • US10846748B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more client devices, systems, and/or methods for onboarding feature cues for a product are provided. A feature cue and an existing feature cue, comprising eligible feature cues (e.g., feature cues that a user has not viewed, are relevant to the user, etc.), are provided to a dispatching component (e.g., configured to provide feature cues to users). A presentation hierarchy, of the feature cue and the existing feature cue, is determined based upon feature cue rules and user parameters. The feature cue, having a first hierarchical position in the presentation hierarchy, is presented to the user, through a client device hosting the product, at a first time. The existing feature cue, having a second hierarchical position in the presentation hierarchy, is presented to the user, through the client device, at a second time, where the first time and the second time are determined by the feature cue rules.