Feature-Model Process Recipes for Wafer Parameter Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Semiconductor wafer processing complexity increases with shrinking device sizes, leading to inefficient process optimization due to numerous process control variables and insufficient in-line precision metrology, resulting in sub-optimal recipes and resource wastage.

Innovation Solution

The use of machine learning feature models to create and match process recipes by determining predicted processing parameters based on target properties, optimizing recipe settings through numerical optimization routines and generating offsets to correct for process disruptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional DoE methods are used with limited wafers for process optimization, then manual tuning and expertise are required, but resource consumption increases and optimal results are not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess optimization precisionVSAvoidwafer resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of wafers through simulation models that replicate physical wafer behavior. These digital twins allow extensive process optimization experiments to be conducted in silico, eliminating the need to consume physical wafers for DoE while maintaining optimization accuracy. The virtual wafer models include layer structures, material properties, and process responses that mirror real wafers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary process optimization through computational simulations before actual wafer processing. By pre-calculating optimal process parameters using trained machine learning models and running virtual experiments, the system identifies best practices in advance, avoiding the need to consume physical wafers during the optimization phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive process parameter tuning is performed to achieve optimal results, then manufacturing precision improves, but processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess capabilityVSAvoiddeployment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs comprehensive process optimization calculations in advance through automated simulations and stores the results in lookup tables. When a real wafer needs processing, the pre-computed optimal parameters are quickly retrieved and applied, achieving high manufacturing precision without the time penalty of real-time optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the complex optimization problem into manageable segments by creating separate virtual wafer models for different process stages and parameter ranges. This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple optimization scenarios, reducing the overall computational time while maintaining comprehensive coverage of the parameter space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If traditional metrology methods are used for process verification, then measurement precision is achieved, but processing speed decreases due to destructive techniques

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetrology precisionVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses virtual wafer models as digital copies that can be measured and analyzed without consuming the physical wafer. These virtual models contain all the process information and can be queried infinitely fast for verification, providing measurement precision equivalent to physical metrology without the time cost or destructive nature of techniques like TEM.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-verification by comparing simulated process outcomes against target specifications using the virtual wafer models. This self-service approach eliminates the need for external destructive metrology measurements, as the simulation inherently provides predicted outcomes that can be immediately verified against requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If extensive DoE experiments are conducted to optimize process parameters, then process capability improves, but the number of required wafers and resources increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess capabilityVSAvoidwafer quantity required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical wafers with virtual wafer models that can be used indefinitely for experimentation. These digital copies allow extensive DoE with multiple parameter variations, repetitions, and edge cases without consuming any additional physical wafers, thus improving process capability while maintaining wafer quantity at minimal levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system explores the parameter space efficiently by using machine learning models to predict outcomes and guide the search for optimal parameters. Instead of exhaustively testing all parameter combinations on physical wafers, the system intelligently navigates the parameter space using virtual simulations, achieving high process capability with far fewer physical resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12158735B2Process recipe creation and matching using feature models
Publication Date: 2024.12.03 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US12158735B2 patent drawing
  • US12158735B2 patent drawing
  • US12158735B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes determining, by a processing device, whether a first process recipe including a set of Pareto efficient parameters is to be selected from a set of process recipes, wherein the set of Pareto efficient parameters fail to satisfy each target property of a set of target properties for processing the component, in response to determining that a first process recipe is not to be selected from a set of process recipes for processing the component, selecting, by the processing device from the set of process recipes, a second process recipe including a set of parameters satisfying each target property of the set of target properties, and causing, by the processing device, the component to be processed by a process tool using the second process recipe.