Feature Relationship Visualization Using Importance-Based Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data visualization techniques struggle to automatically identify and highlight useful features without user intervention, particularly for users lacking domain knowledge or data analysis expertise.

Innovation Solution

A visualization device that includes an analysis unit to assess feature importance, an extraction unit to select feature combinations, and a drawing unit to prioritize and visualize these features based on their importance and relationships.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated feature importance analysis is implemented, then visualization accuracy of useful features is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature importance identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex visualization task into distinct functional modules: an analysis unit that calculates feature importance scores, an extraction unit that selects important feature combinations, and a drawing unit that visualizes them. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in one aspect, improving overall accuracy while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer between raw data and visualization output. The analysis unit computes importance scores as intermediate representations, and the extraction unit further processes these scores to identify meaningful feature combinations. This intermediary layer acts as a mediator that transforms complex data relationships into可视化-friendly formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If automated feature extraction is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser operation simplicityVSAvoiddata feature information loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter representation from raw feature values to importance scores. The analysis unit transforms complex multi-dimensional feature relationships into scalar importance scores that preserve the essential information while making the data more manageable for automated processing and visualization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of extracting all possible feature combinations, the system selectively extracts only those feature combinations whose importance scores meet predetermined thresholds. This partial action approach focuses computational resources on the most significant features, maintaining ease of operation while minimizing information loss by preserving the most relevant data aspects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive feature analysis is performed, then visualization quality is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisualization qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The analysis unit performs preliminary analysis by calculating importance scores for all features before the actual visualization process. This preliminary action identifies and prioritizes important features in advance, allowing the drawing unit to focus computational resources on visualizing only the most significant feature combinations, thereby improving visualization quality while reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the depth and scope of feature analysis based on the calculated importance scores. High-scoring features receive more detailed analysis and visualization attention, while lower-scoring features are processed more efficiently or omitted. This dynamic approach optimizes the balance between comprehensive analysis and processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12608398B2Visualization device, visualization method and visualization program
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 NT T INC
  • US12608398B2 patent drawing
  • US12608398B2 patent drawing
  • US12608398B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with a score representing a relationship between features of input data, an analysis unit analyzes the importance of each feature. An extraction unit extracts a combination of features in which the score satisfies a predetermined condition. A specification unit specifies a visualization system for the combination in accordance with at least the types and connection relationships of the features constituting the extracted combination. A drawing unit draws the relationship between the features constituting the combination in order of priority according to the importance, based on the combination of the features and the visualization system corresponding to the combination.