Feature Set Extraction for Explainable AI Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of maintaining prediction accuracy while improving explainability in AI models is exacerbated by the generation of a large number of feature sets through data mining, leading to deteriorated interpretability and increased multicollinearity, which complicates regression analysis and hampers effective feature identification.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an extraction device that selects a specific number of feature sets based on statistical information, using subset extraction and combination generation units to output combinations that enhance explainability and reduce the number of explanatory variables, thereby mitigating multicollinearity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the number of feature types included in prediction target data is increased to improve prediction accuracy, then prediction accuracy is improved, but it becomes difficult to identify which feature is useful for prediction, thus deteriorating the explainability of prediction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidexplainability of prediction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary and useful feature sets from the large number of generated feature sets by using statistical information and significance tests. This extraction process removes redundant and irrelevant feature sets, retaining only those that contribute meaningfully to prediction, thereby maintaining prediction accuracy while improving explainability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of feature set selection by introducing statistical significance thresholds and extraction criteria. Instead of using all generated feature sets, the system applies parameter-based filtering to select only those feature sets that meet predetermined statistical criteria, thus balancing prediction accuracy with interpretability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If data mining is used to generate a combination of feature types useful for making prediction, then the number of feature types is increased, but the number of generated feature sets increases, making it difficult to interpret prediction basis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of feature typesVSAvoidnumber of generated feature sets
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies extraction by selecting only the most significant feature sets from the large number generated through data mining. By using statistical tests and significance criteria, the system extracts a manageable subset of feature sets that maintain predictive power while reducing complexity and improving interpretability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of processing all generated feature sets, the patent applies partial action by selectively processing only those feature sets that meet statistical significance thresholds. This partial processing approach avoids the complexity of handling all possible feature sets while still capturing the essential predictive information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If a large number of feature sets are generated by data mining, then more comprehensive prediction coverage is achieved, but multicollinearity increases and regression analysis becomes complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction coverageVSAvoidmulticollinearity and analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts feature sets that are statistically significant and removes those that contribute to multicollinearity. By applying extraction based on statistical criteria, the system maintains comprehensive prediction coverage while eliminating redundant and correlated feature sets that complicate regression analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the selection parameters for feature sets by introducing statistical significance thresholds and correlation-based filtering. This parameter change approach ensures that only feature sets with meaningful predictive power and low multicollinearity are retained, simplifying regression analysis while maintaining prediction coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250355969A1Non-transitory computer-readable recording medium, extraction device, and extraction method
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 FUJITSU LTD
  • US20250355969A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355969A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355969A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A non-transitory computer-readable recording medium has stored therein an extraction program that causes a computer to execute a process. The process includes extracting a plurality of subsets from a data set including a plurality of pieces of data including a feature quantity of each of a plurality of feature types, the plurality of subsets each including part of the plurality of pieces of data. The process includes obtaining, using each of the plurality of subsets, a combination of features useful for data prediction. The process includes extracting a specific number of combinations from a plurality of the combinations obtained from the plurality of subsets, the extracting being based on statistical information regarding each of the plurality of combinations. The process includes outputting the specific number of combinations.