Decentralized Feature Toggles for Cross-System Dependency Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In large enterprise software systems with hybrid and cloud deployments, manual and time-consuming upgrades are required to maintain consistency across disparate systems due to interconnected software components, leading to potential errors and failures during feature updates.

Innovation Solution

Implement decentralized feature toggles with annotations specifying code changes and dependencies across interconnected systems, using AI models to analyze and recommend necessary upgrades, ensuring consistent and error-free system operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual upgrades are performed to maintain consistency across interconnected software systems, then system reliability is improved, but time consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem consistencyVSAvoidupgrade time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of dependency relationships between software systems before executing upgrades. By pre-identifying which systems depend on each other and what upgrades are needed, the system automates the coordination of multi-system upgrades, reducing manual intervention time while maintaining consistency across interconnected systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that automatically detect upgrade requirements across interconnected systems and coordinate updates based on dependency relationships. This feedback loop enables automated consistency maintenance without requiring manual assessment of which systems need upgrading and when

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual upgrades are performed across disparate software systems, then feature consistency is improved, but operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature consistencyVSAvoidupgrade management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary upgrade management platform that sits between disparate software systems and coordinates upgrades automatically. This intermediary analyzes dependency relationships, determines upgrade requirements, and orchestrates updates across multiple systems, reducing the complexity of managing upgrades across heterogeneous software landscapes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the upgrade management process into distinct analytical components: dependency analysis, upgrade requirement identification, and coordinated execution. By breaking down the complex task of multi-system upgrade management into manageable segments, the system reduces operational complexity while maintaining feature consistency across interconnected systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If decentralized feature toggles are implemented across multiple software systems, then system adaptability is improved, but dependency management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature deployment flexibilityVSAvoiddependency analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms that continuously analyze dependency relationships between decentralized feature toggles across multiple software systems. This feedback enables the system to automatically identify when feature deployments in one system affect other systems, maintaining adaptability while managing complexity through automated dependency tracking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary analysis service that manages dependency relationships between decentralized feature toggles. This intermediary automatically analyzes which systems depend on each other and coordinates feature deployments accordingly, enabling high adaptability across distributed systems while reducing the complexity of tracking inter-system dependencies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12511108B2Systems and methods for decentralized feature toggles
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 SAP SE
  • US12511108B2 patent drawing
  • US12511108B2 patent drawing
  • US12511108B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure include techniques for decentralizing feature toggles. In certain embodiments, feature toggles are generated for features across a plurality of software systems. The feature toggles include annotations specifying dependencies across the plurality of software systems. The annotated feature toggles are stored in a central repository accessible by the plurality of software systems. When a feature toggle is enabled, feature toggles across the systems may be retrieved from the repository and analyzed by an LLM to determine which feature toggles may need to be updated to prevent a software error.