Feature Trait Detection in Imbalanced Datasets via Regression Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current classification algorithms have a low recall rate and fail to accurately detect feature traits of a group, such as customers with high net worth, as they do not effectively focus on the accuracy of feature contribution in predicting outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method involving building regression models to compute feature contribution scores, selecting features based on variance between positive and negative cases, and generating prediction probability values to identify feature traits from an imbalanced dataset, with a focus on predictor importance values exceeding threshold values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If current classification algorithms are used on imbalanced datasets, then the processing speed is maintained, but the recall rate is low and feature trait detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature trait detection accuracyVSAvoidrecall rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the feature selection process into multiple stages: first selecting features with high contribution scores, then filtering by variance thresholds, and finally ranking by predictor importance. This multi-stage segmentation allows the system to systematically identify relevant features from imbalanced datasets, improving both recall rate and detection accuracy without compromising processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-computing contribution scores for all features using regression models before the actual classification process. This preliminary feature scoring and filtering prepares the data in advance, ensuring that when classification occurs, the most relevant features are already identified, thereby improving recall rate and feature trait detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If traditional classification algorithms are applied, then computational resources are conserved, but the ability to accurately detect feature traits of partitioned groups deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature trait detection accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most relevant features from the complete feature set by applying contribution score thresholds and variance filters. This extraction process removes irrelevant features before feeding data to the classification model, improving feature trait detection accuracy while actually reducing the computational burden and model complexity by working with a smaller, more focused feature subset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different quality criteria to different stages of feature selection: contribution scores measure feature relevance to the target, variance thresholds ensure feature discrimination between positive and negative cases, and predictor importance rankings prioritize the most influential features. This multi-criteria local quality assessment improves detection accuracy without requiring uniformly complex processing across all features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If feature selection based on contribution scores and variance is implemented, then feature trait detection accuracy is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature trait detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selecting only a subset of features that meet the contribution score and variance thresholds, rather than processing all features. This partial feature selection achieves sufficient detection accuracy for the application while significantly reducing processing time compared to analyzing the complete feature set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20220414504A1Identifying traits of partitioned group from imbalanced dataset
Publication Date: 2022.12.29 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20220414504A1 patent drawing
  • US20220414504A1 patent drawing
  • US20220414504A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method, system and computer program product for detecting feature traits from an imbalanced dataset. A first regression model is built based on a simulated dataset to compute contribution scores for the features to make a target a positive case. A variance in the features' original values for each feature of the first set of features (those features with contribution scores for positive cases that exceed a threshold value) between the positive and negative cases is determined. A second regression model is built to calculate a predictor importance value for a second set of features (features from the first set of features with a variance in their original values for both positive and negative cases that exceeds a threshold value). Feature traits are then extracted from a group of clustered positive cases with features of the second set of features containing a predictor importance value exceeding a threshold value.