General Feature Vectors for Reconstruction and Fingerprint Discrimination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques for generating representational forms of media data are inefficient and inflexible, lacking versatility in updating historical archives and creating task-specific representations, leading to redundancies and inefficiencies as new applications and technologies emerge.

Innovation Solution

A unified representation learning system that jointly trains machine-learning-based models for feature extraction, signal processing, reconstruction, and fingerprint generation, enabling the generation of general feature vectors that support multiple tasks, allowing for efficient updating and maintenance of archives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional techniques are used for generating representational forms of media data, then the process is simple and straightforward, but the system lacks versatility and flexibility in updating historical archives and creating task-specific representations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveversatility in updating historical archives and creating task-specific representationsVSAvoidcomplexity of the representation learning system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a unified representation learning system that performs multiple functions: feature extraction, signal conditioning, signal recovery, and reconstruction, all within a single integrated architecture. This allows the system to handle diverse tasks including updating historical archives and creating task-specific representations, thereby achieving versatility without requiring separate systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic training iterations where the unified model is repeatedly trained on historical archives with different task-specific configurations. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt to new tasks and update archives flexibly, achieving adaptability while maintaining a single unified structure rather than creating static separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If separate models are trained for each task (image reconstruction, fingerprint generation, etc.), then each model can be optimized for its specific task, but redundancies and inefficiencies arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency in updating and maintaining archivesVSAvoidredundancies in the system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges previously separate models (feature extraction, signal conditioning, signal recovery, reconstruction) into a single unified representation learning model. This consolidation eliminates redundancies in processing pipelines and reduces the overall computational overhead required for maintaining archives, thereby improving productivity while reducing waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified model serves multiple purposes: it extracts features, conditions signals, recovers signals, and reconstructs images all within a single framework. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate optimized models for each task, reducing redundancies while maintaining efficiency across all operations including archive updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a unified representation learning system is implemented, then versatility and flexibility are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to support diverse tasksVSAvoidcomplexity of training and implementing the unified system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

While unified in structure, the system segments the training process into distinct functional components (feature extraction, signal conditioning, signal recovery, reconstruction) that can be trained and optimized separately before being integrated. This segmentation approach manages complexity by allowing focused development of each component while maintaining the benefits of a unified system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces general feature vectors as intermediary representations that bridge different tasks and functions within the unified system. These intermediate representations simplify the complexity by providing a common interface between various operations, making the unified system more manageable while preserving its versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If conventional separate models are used, then implementation is straightforward, but real-time and historical analysis of media content becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency in real-time and historical analysisVSAvoidtime required for processing media content
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The unified representation learning system combines multiple processing functions into a single integrated model, eliminating the sequential overhead of running separate models for feature extraction, signal conditioning, recovery, and reconstruction. This merging reduces the total processing time required for both real-time and historical media content analysis, thereby improving productivity and reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250342405A1Unified Representation Learning of Media Features for Diverse Tasks
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 GRACENOTE INC
  • US20250342405A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342405A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342405A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are disclosed for generating general feature vectors (GFVs), each simultaneously constructed for separate tasks of image reconstruction and fingerprint-based image discrimination. The computing system may include machine-learning-based components configured for extracting GFVs from images, signal processing for both transmission and reception and recovery of the extracted GFVs, generating reconstructed images from the recovered GFVs, and discriminating between fingerprints generated from the recovered GFVs and query fingerprints generated from query GFVs. A set of training images may be received at the computing system. In each of one or more training iterations over the set of training images, the components may be jointly trained with each training image of the set by minimizing a joint loss function computed as a sum of losses due to signal processing and recovery, image reconstruction, and fingerprint discrimination. The trained components may be configured for runtime implementation among one or more computing devices.