FEC Bit Mapping for Priority-Based Wireless Data Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems lack efficient methods to differentiate reliability based on the importance of information bits, leading to suboptimal recovery rates of high-priority data in noisy environments.

Innovation Solution

Implementing forward error correction encoding techniques that prioritize high-priority information bits to higher reliability bit positions in modulation constellations, using either concatenated or parallel encoding methods to ensure accurate transmission and flexible recovery of critical data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If forward error correction encoding is applied to all information bits uniformly, then overall error protection is provided, but high-priority bits cannot be differentiated for enhanced reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery rate of high-priority information bitsVSAvoidencoding structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The information bits are segmented into multiple priority levels (first priority, second priority, etc.), and separate forward error correction encoding operations are applied to each priority group. This segmentation allows high-priority bits to receive enhanced protection through mapping to more reliable bit positions in the modulation constellation, while maintaining manageable encoding complexity through structured processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different reliability levels are assigned to different bit positions within the modulation constellation. High-priority information bits are mapped to bit positions with higher reliability (e.g., positions less susceptible to errors in the modulation scheme), while lower-priority bits are mapped to positions with lower reliability. This local differentiation of quality achieves enhanced protection for critical data without uniformly increasing complexity across all bits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If all information bits are mapped to high reliability bit positions, then maximum recovery rate is achieved, but data transmission efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuccessful recovery rate of information bitsVSAvoiddata transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of mapping all bits to high-reliability positions, the patent applies local quality differentiation by mapping only high-priority information bits to high-reliability bit positions in the modulation constellation. Lower-priority bits are mapped to positions with acceptable but lower reliability. This selective approach maintains high transmission efficiency while ensuring critical data receives enhanced protection where it is most needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by providing enhanced error protection only to the extent necessary for high-priority bits. Rather than uniformly applying maximum protection to all bits (which would reduce efficiency), the system applies excessive protection selectively to critical data portions, achieving sufficient reliability for important information while maintaining overall transmission efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If priority-based mapping is implemented, then differential protection is achieved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifferential protection capabilityVSAvoidmapping and encoding processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the encoding process into distinct stages: priority classification of information bits, separate forward error correction encoding for each priority group, and structured mapping to specific bit positions in the modulation constellation. This segmentation of processing steps makes the differential protection mechanism more manageable and implementable, reducing overall processing complexity through systematic organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary classification of information bits into priority groups before the encoding and mapping processes. By pre-organizing bits according to priority and pre-determining which bit positions in the modulation constellation will receive high-priority data, the system simplifies subsequent processing steps and reduces real-time computational complexity during transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12432011B2Forward error correction encoding with reliability differentiation
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12432011B2 patent drawing
  • US12432011B2 patent drawing
  • US12432011B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure provides methods, devices, and systems for forward error correction encoding and modulation with reliability differentiation. In some examples, a transmitting wireless communication device may use a concatenated encoding technique to generate a set of encoded bits that conveys both information bits of a first priority and information bits of a second priority lower than the first priority. In other examples, the transmitting device may use a parallel encoding technique to generate a first set of encoded bits that conveys information bits of the first priority and a second set of encoded bits that conveys information bits of the second priority. According to aspects of the disclosure, the transmitting device can map encoded bits corresponding to information bits of the first priority to relatively higher reliability bit positions of a modulation constellation.