Federated Learning Service for Edge Model Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current federated learning approaches face challenges in efficiently managing and deploying machine learning models across decentralized edge devices while ensuring data privacy and security.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a federated learning service that enables remote training and deployment of ML models using edge devices, allowing for local data utilization, secure model management, and decentralized data handling. This service includes modules for remote deployment, training, and data management, ensuring secure and scalable operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If federated learning is implemented across decentralized edge devices, then data privacy and security are improved, but system complexity and deployment management become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata privacyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A centralized federated learning service acts as an intermediary between the cloud and decentralized edge devices. This service coordinates model training, manages device registration, handles hyperparameter configuration, and aggregates updates from multiple devices, thereby simplifying the overall system complexity while maintaining data privacy through decentralized learning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If training data is decentralized across edge devices, then data security is improved, but training efficiency and model convergence become challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidtraining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The training process is segmented into distributed training tasks executed independently on multiple edge devices. Each device trains local model instances using its own data, and the federated learning service aggregates these distributed training results, thereby maintaining data security while achieving efficient parallel training across the network

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If edge devices are used for local model training, then deployment scalability is improved, but device resource constraints and heterogeneity become more significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment scalabilityVSAvoiddevice heterogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The federated learning service provides universal functionality that works across diverse edge devices with different resources and capabilities. It dynamically configures training tasks, adjusts hyperparameters based on device characteristics, and manages model deployment universally across heterogeneous devices, thereby enabling scalable deployment while abstracting away device-specific complexities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12321835B1Federated learning service in a provider network and training machine learning models using devices external to the provider network
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12321835B1 patent drawing
  • US12321835B1 patent drawing
  • US12321835B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for utilizing a federated learning service are described. An exemplary method includes causing a development of a deployable machine learning model using at least two devices, the development of the deployable machine learning model including: providing an initial machine learning model or algorithm to the at least two devices external to the provider network, causing each of the at least two devices external to the provider network to locally train the initial machine learning model or algorithm using training data to each generate a modified version of the initial machine learning model, determining updates between the initial model and the generated modified versions of the initial machine learning model, and applying the determined updates to the initial model to generate the candidate machine learning model.