Federated Learning Model Updates for Privacy-Preserving Media Recommendations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine learning models face challenges in recommending media content that truly interests users while ensuring user data privacy, as they require vast amounts of user information, which is sensitive and private, and existing centralized learning methods compromise data security.

Innovation Solution

Implementing federated learning, where client devices obtain and update a machine learning model based on user interactions with media content, allowing the model to improve performance without sharing sensitive user data, ensuring data security and privacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If centralized machine learning methods are used to improve recommendation performance, then the model can access vast amounts of user information, but user data privacy and security are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoiddata privacy risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the machine learning model from the centralized server and places it on distributed client devices. The model is trained locally on user data without extracting or transmitting the actual user information to the server, thus achieving accurate recommendations while protecting data privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized training process is segmented into distributed local training sessions across multiple client devices. Each device independently trains the model on its local data, and only model updates (not raw data) are aggregated, dividing the system into privacy-preserving autonomous units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If user data is collected and transmitted to server for model training, then recommendation performance improves, but data security is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training effectivenessVSAvoiddata security
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of local model training and update aggregation. Instead of directly transmitting user data to the server, the system uses local model instances as intermediaries that process data locally and only exchange encrypted model parameter updates, preserving security while enabling collaborative learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model is copied to multiple client devices, creating local replicas that can be trained independently on local data. These copies enable distributed learning without centralizing sensitive user information, maintaining security while improving training effectiveness through local data utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Object-affected harmful factors

If federated learning is implemented to protect user privacy, then data security is maintained, but model performance may be limited by local data availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata privacy protectionVSAvoidrecommendation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges results from multiple local training sessions across different client devices through aggregation of model updates. By combining knowledge from diverse local datasets while maintaining privacy, the system achieves recommendation accuracy that exceeds what any single local device could achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where model performance is evaluated locally, updates are generated based on local interactions, and these updates are aggregated and redistributed. This continuous feedback mechanism ensures the model progressively improves accuracy while maintaining privacy constraints throughout the learning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240193468A1Federated learning for media content recommendation
Publication Date: 2024.06.13 LEMON INC(GB)
  • US20240193468A1 patent drawing
  • US20240193468A1 patent drawing
  • US20240193468A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is proposed for media content recommendation. In the method, a client device obtains a first version of a machine learning model for media content recommendation from a server. A first set of media contents is recommended based on local information of the client device according to the first version of the machine learning model. An update to the machine learning model is determined based on respective interactions of the user with the first set of media contents. The client device provides the update to the server.