Federated Learning for Memory Device Aging Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting the mean time to failure (MTTF) of memory devices are often expensive and time-consuming, involving in-lab evaluations, and lack efficient decentralized solutions for aging prediction and data privacy.

Innovation Solution

The use of memory-side channel analysis for federated learning, where machine learning models are trained on memory usage and device characteristics at different tiers, aggregated to predict MTTF without sharing private data, enabling decentralized training and deployment across customer platforms at varying price points based on specificity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If in-lab evaluations are used to predict MTTF of memory devices, then prediction accuracy is improved, but cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMTTF prediction accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical in-lab evaluation mechanisms with a computational machine learning model that processes memory usage data and device characteristics to predict MTTF. This substitution eliminates the need for time-consuming physical testing while maintaining prediction accuracy through algorithmic analysis of operational patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary data collection and model training during normal device operation, gathering memory usage data and device characteristics in advance. This preliminary action enables the ML model to be ready for deployment without requiring subsequent in-lab evaluation, thus reducing time consumption while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If in-lab evaluations are used to predict MTTF of memory devices, then prediction accuracy is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMTTF prediction accuracyVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive in-lab evaluation infrastructure with a software-based machine learning solution that runs on existing computing devices. This substitution eliminates the need for specialized laboratory equipment and personnel, significantly reducing costs while maintaining prediction accuracy through computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the evaluation process through a machine learning model that replicates the predictive capabilities of in-lab evaluations without requiring physical testing. This digital copy enables accurate MTTF prediction at a fraction of the cost of physical evaluations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If centralized data collection is used for training ML models, then model accuracy is improved, but data privacy is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoiddata privacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the centralized training process into distributed local training units across multiple devices. Each device trains its own ML model locally using its private data, then only model parameters (not raw data) are shared and aggregated. This segmentation maintains data privacy while achieving model accuracy through collective learning from distributed data sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces federated learning as an intermediary mechanism that enables collaborative model training without direct data sharing. The intermediary aggregates model updates from multiple devices while preserving the privacy of individual device data, thus maintaining both data privacy and model accuracy through indirect information exchange.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240220860A1Machine learning model aggregation
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20240220860A1 patent drawing
  • US20240220860A1 patent drawing
  • US20240220860A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems associated with a machine learning model aggregation are described. A system can include a first computing device, a second computing device, a local federated server, and a global federated server. The first computing device and the second computing device can train respective first and second machine learning models based on gathered memory usage data and device characteristic data associated with a respective first plurality of memory devices and second plurality of memory devices. The local federated server can aggregate the first machine learning model and the second machine learning model into a third machine learning model. The global federated server can aggregate the third machine learning model with a fourth machine learning model comprising a plurality of aggregated machine learning models into a fifth machine learning model and predict aging of the first plurality of memory devices and the second plurality of memory devices.