Federated Learning Node Model Selection and Sharing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current multimodal training methods in federated learning lack an efficient mechanism for selecting and sharing learning models between nodes, which hampers the effective utilization of distributed data while ensuring privacy and security.

Innovation Solution

A novel information processing system and method that includes a node with a display control unit, reception unit, and transmission unit, allowing for the display of local model identification information, selection of local models, and transmission of selection information to other devices, facilitating the appropriate selection and sharing of learning models across nodes in a federated learning framework.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If local models are trained and stored at each node using distributed data, then data utilization and model accuracy are improved, but information security and privacy protection deteriorate due to the risk of sensitive data exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoiddata security risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates copies of local models trained on distributed data and stores them in a shared space accessible by multiple nodes. Instead of sharing sensitive raw data, nodes exchange and utilize model copies that encapsulate learned patterns, thereby maintaining data security while improving model accuracy through access to diverse data distributions across nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple local models are generated and stored at each node, then model selection flexibility and adaptability are improved, but device complexity and storage requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel selection flexibilityVSAvoidstorage complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the storage and management of multiple local models into a shared space that is collectively maintained by multiple nodes. Instead of each node independently storing all local models (which would exponentially increase storage complexity), nodes share the burden of storing model copies, reducing individual device complexity while preserving model selection flexibility through the shared repository.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If local models are shared across nodes, then information utilization efficiency is improved, but information security and privacy protection worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation utilization efficiencyVSAvoidprivacy protection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables information utilization by creating and sharing copies of local models across nodes, allowing efficient access to knowledge derived from distributed data. Privacy protection is maintained because only model copies (not raw sensitive data) are shared, and the shared space architecture controls access to these copies, thereby achieving both high information utilization efficiency and reliable privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Ease of operation

If a centralized system manages all local models, then model coordination and selection are simplified, but system scalability and distributed autonomy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel coordination simplicityVSAvoidsystem scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the model management function by creating a distributed shared space where each node can independently store, access, and manage model copies. This eliminates the need for a centralized management system, allowing the system to scale distributedly while maintaining coordination through the shared space architecture. Each node retains autonomy to contribute and utilize models, enhancing both scalability and distributed adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4451179A1Node, information processing system, information processing method, and carrier medium
Publication Date: 2024.10.23 RICOH CO LTD
  • EP4451179A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4451179A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4451179A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A node (3) includes a display control unit (33), a reception unit (32), and a transmission unit (31). The display control unit (33) displays on a display unit (308), local model identification information (1364) identifying a local model generated by another node and a classification item (1362) that classifies learning data used to generate the local model. The reception unit (32) receives selection of the local model. The transmission unit (31) transmits selection information indicating the selection of the local model to another device.