Federated Source Code Management for Automated Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual deployment of software applications across platforms with different configurations is error-prone and labor-intensive, often resulting in incorrect updates or errors being introduced into production.

Innovation Solution

A federated source code management system with a production repository that accepts software from a single committer, coupled with platform management infrastructure that monitors for changes and automatically pushes updates to affected repositories, automating the deployment and update process across various platforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual deployment process is used to accommodate different platform requirements, then deployment flexibility and platform adaptability are improved, but error rate increases and labor intensity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform adaptabilityVSAvoiddeployment error rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service deployment by automatically detecting platform configurations and selecting appropriate deployment parameters and commands without human intervention. The deployment automation system monitors itself and executes deployment actions based on pre-defined rules and platform characteristics, eliminating manual errors while maintaining platform adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where deployment outcomes are automatically monitored and validated. If deployment fails or produces unexpected results, the system receives feedback and automatically adjusts deployment parameters or retries with corrected settings, thereby reducing error rates while maintaining flexibility across different platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual deployment process is used to accommodate different platform requirements, then deployment flexibility is improved, but labor intensity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment flexibilityVSAvoiddeployment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The deployment automation system performs self-service by automatically configuring deployment parameters based on detected platform characteristics and executing deployment actions without requiring manual intervention. This eliminates repetitive manual labor while preserving deployment flexibility through automated platform adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a universal deployment automation platform that can handle multiple platform types and deployment scenarios through a single unified interface. The automation system adapts to different platforms using pre-configured platform profiles and standardized deployment workflows, eliminating the need for separate manual processes for each platform while maintaining flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automated deployment system is implemented, then productivity and error reduction are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment efficiencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automation system is segmented into distinct functional modules: platform detection module, parameter selection module, deployment execution module, and validation module. Each module performs a specific function and can be independently configured and maintained. This modular architecture reduces overall system complexity by breaking down the automation process into manageable, standardized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary deployment automation layer between the deployment artifacts and the target platforms. This intermediary automatically translates high-level deployment requirements into platform-specific actions, shielding users from system complexity while maintaining high productivity. The intermediary handles platform detection, parameter selection, and execution details automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If single committer production repository is used, then deployment reliability is improved, but collaboration flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment reliabilityVSAvoidcollaboration ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the deployment authorization function from the committer role and concentrates it in a single designated deployment committer. This separation allows multiple developers to contribute to the codebase without having deployment permissions, ensuring that only authorized personnel can initiate production deployments. This maintains collaboration flexibility for development while ensuring deployment reliability through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by requiring deployment requests to go through a formal review and approval process before deployment committer execution. Deployment parameters and artifacts are pre-validated and staged in the automation system, ensuring that only verified changes reach production. This preliminary validation maintains collaboration ease for development while ensuring deployment reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8943493B2Automation of application deployment
Publication Date: 2015.01.27 RED HAT INC
  • US8943493B2 patent drawing
  • US8943493B2 patent drawing
  • US8943493B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments of automating application deployment have been presented. In one embodiment, a production repository is created in a federated source code management system to accept software from only a single committer. The production repository is coupled to a set of repositories. Platform management infrastructure monitors the production repository for changes to the software. Further, the platform management infrastructure may automatically push the changes to one or more repositories affected.