Federated Model Update Serialization in Communication Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Collating training data for machine-learning models in communication networks at a single network entity is slow, resource-intensive, and poses security risks, especially when dealing with sensitive data.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a collaborative (federated) learning process where local model updates are trained at multiple network entities and combined at an aggregator entity, using serialized representations that omit model structure information to ensure data privacy and reduce resource overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If training data is collated at a single network entity, then machine-learning models can be trained centrally, but the process becomes slow and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training accuracyVSAvoiddata collation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the centralized data collation process into distributed local training operations at multiple network entities. Each entity trains models locally using its own data, eliminating the time-consuming process of gathering all data at one location while maintaining model training capability through distributed computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-dimension centralized training approach to a multi-dimensional distributed training architecture. By adding the spatial dimension of multiple network entities performing training simultaneously, the system reduces overall training time while maintaining model quality through aggregation of local model updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If training data is collated at a single network entity, then centralized model training can be performed, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training accuracyVSAvoidnetwork resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the resource-intensive centralized training task into smaller local training operations distributed across multiple network entities. Each entity consumes resources locally for training, avoiding the集中 resource consumption at a single entity, thereby reducing overall network resource burden while achieving the same model training objective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates copies of the model at multiple network entities, allowing each to perform local training independently. This eliminates the need for one entity to handle all training resources, distributing the computational burden across multiple copies of the model instance rather than concentrating resources at a single location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If training data is collated at a single network entity, then centralized model development can occur, but security risks increase for sensitive data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training accuracyVSAvoiddata security risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sensitive training data across multiple network entities, preventing concentration of sensitive information at a single location. Each entity retains its data locally, reducing security risks associated with data aggregation while still enabling collaborative model training through sharing of model updates rather than raw data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the necessary model update information from local training operations and transmits this to the aggregating entity, leaving sensitive raw training data at local entities. This extraction approach maintains model training capability while removing the security vulnerability of transmitting or storing sensitive raw data at centralized locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12585986B2Methods, apparatus and machine-readable media relating to machine-learning in a communication network
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US12585986B2 patent drawing
  • US12585986B2 patent drawing
  • US12585986B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method performed by a first network entity in a communications network includes training a model to obtain a local model update including an update to values of one or more parameters of the model, in which training the model includes inputting training data into a machine learning algorithm. The method further includes applying a serialisation function to the local model update to construct a serial representation of the local model update, thereby removing information indicative of a structure of the model, and transmitting the serial representation of the local model update to an aggregator entity in the communications network.