Feed Forward Control Circuit for Buck-Boost Regulator Glitch Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional buck-boost regulators experience glitches and inefficiencies when transitioning between buck mode and boost mode due to feedback loop delays, leading to disturbances and delayed responses in output voltage regulation.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a feed-forward circuit that level-shifts the error signal based on feed-forward input signals, reducing lag time and smoothing mode transitions by providing a pre-defined adjustment to the error signal, thereby enabling faster response to input changes and minimizing output disturbances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional feedback control is used in buck-boost regulators, then power conversion efficiency is achieved, but transient response is delayed and glitches occur during mode transitions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput voltage stabilityVSAvoidtransient response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The feed-forward circuit performs preliminary action by adjusting the error signal in advance based on the input voltage level. When the input voltage changes, the feed-forward circuit immediately modifies the error signal to compensate for the expected voltage drop or rise, before the actual output voltage deviation occurs. This eliminates the waiting time for the feedback loop to detect and respond to changes, thereby reducing transient response time while maintaining output stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If feedback loop is used for voltage regulation, then output stability is maintained, but mode transitions between buck and boost produce glitches and disturbances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput voltage stabilityVSAvoidtransient glitches and disturbances
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The feed-forward circuit applies preliminary anti-action by anticipating the direction and magnitude of output voltage deviations during mode transitions. When transitioning between buck and boost modes, the circuit pre-adjusts the error signal to counteract the expected voltage glitch, effectively neutralizing the disturbance before it affects the output. This prevents the harmful transient glitches while maintaining overall output stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Measurement precision

If conventional error amplification is used, then voltage regulation is achieved, but response to input changes is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage regulation accuracyVSAvoidresponse speed to input changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The feed-forward circuit performs preliminary action by immediately responding to input voltage changes and adjusting the error signal accordingly, before the feedback loop completes its detection and correction cycle. This parallel pre-adjustment mechanism maintains the precision of voltage regulation while dramatically improving the response speed to input changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Use of energy by moving object

If feedback-only control is implemented, then power conversion efficiency is optimized, but transient response requires increased power consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower conversion efficiencyVSAvoidpower consumption during transient response
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The feed-forward circuit performs preliminary action by pre-adjusting the error signal based on input voltage changes, enabling the regulator to respond to transients without requiring excessive corrective power. This reduces the power consumption spike that would otherwise be needed during transient response events, while maintaining the efficient power conversion characteristics of the feedback-controlled operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8106639B1Feed forward control of switching regulator
Publication Date: 2012.01.31 NAT SEMICON CORP
  • US8106639B1 patent drawing
  • US8106639B1 patent drawing
  • US8106639B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a switching regulator with an error amplifier circuit and a feed-forward circuit. The error amplifier circuit provides an error signal by amplifying the difference between a feedback signal and a reference signal. The feed-forward circuit level-shifts the output of the error amplifier based on the feed-forward input signal and a scaling factor. The resulting adjusted error signal includes both feed-back and feed-forward signal components. A PWM comparator is employed to compare the adjusted error signal to a ramp signal. Switched-mode regulation is performed based on the PWM comparator output. In addition, buck-boost mode transition smoothing circuitry may also be employed to smooth the buck-mode/boost-mode transition in a buck-boost switching regulator.