Feed-Forward Control for DC-DC Buck Converters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for DC to DC buck converters face inefficiencies and inaccuracies in providing lower voltages, particularly when using voltage divider circuits, and struggle with slow response times and increased noise when increasing bandwidth to improve step response.

Innovation Solution

A feed-forward control system for load current in DC to DC converters, comprising a current normalization module, a feed-forward generation module, and a duty cycle generation module, which generates a load current feed-forward signal based on normalized load current to improve apparent bandwidth without increasing actual bandwidth, thereby reducing output voltage drops and allowing for smaller capacitors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If voltage divider circuit is used to obtain lower voltage, then voltage can be obtained, but efficiency and accuracy are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoidvoltage accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the passive voltage divider circuit with an active buck converter system that uses electromagnetic induction and switching control to achieve voltage conversion. This substitution transforms the mechanical/electrical passive system into an active controlled system, dramatically improving both efficiency and voltage accuracy while providing dynamic control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operating parameters by using switching control to vary the duty cycle of the buck converter, allowing dynamic adjustment of output voltage. This enables precise voltage control and high efficiency operation compared to the fixed ratio of voltage divider circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If bandwidth is increased to improve step response, then step response improves, but noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestep response speedVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feed-forward control that anticipates load changes and adjusts the duty cycle in advance. By measuring the load current and calculating the required duty cycle adjustment before the voltage drop occurs, the system maintains fast step response without needing to increase the feedback bandwidth, thereby avoiding noise amplification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a feed-forward control path as an intermediary mechanism that works parallel to the feedback control. This intermediary path provides proactive compensation for load changes, allowing the feedback bandwidth to remain lower and thus avoiding noise while still achieving fast step response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Area of stationary object

If capacitor size is reduced to decrease area and costs, then area and costs decrease, but performance may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapacitor areaVSAvoidoutput voltage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional reliance on large capacitors for voltage regulation with an active control system using feed-forward and feedback control mechanisms. This substitution allows smaller capacitors to achieve the same or better voltage stability by using electronic control to compensate for the reduced capacitance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameters dynamically based on load conditions, adjusting the duty cycle in real-time to maintain output voltage stability. This dynamic parameter adjustment compensates for the reduced capacitor size, allowing the system to maintain reliability with smaller energy storage components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9438110B2Systems and methods for feed-forward control of load current in DC to DC buck converters
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 MAXIM INTEGRATED PROD INC
  • US9438110B2 patent drawing
  • US9438110B2 patent drawing
  • US9438110B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for controlling load current in a voltage converter includes a current normalization module that receives a first measurement corresponding to the load current, receives a second measurement corresponding to an inductor current, and matches a first gain of the first measurement corresponding to the load current to a second gain of the second measurement corresponding to the inductor current to generate a normalized load current. A feed-forward generation module receives the normalized load current from the current normalization module and generates a load current feed-forward (LCFF) signal based on the normalized load current. A duty cycle generation module generates a duty cycle used to control the voltage converter based on a commanded output voltage of the voltage converter and the LCFF signal.