Feed-Forward Merge Pipeline for Skew-Resilient Data Sorting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional merge sorting methods face inefficiencies due to distribution skew, high implementation overheads, and underutilization of resources, particularly in parallel merge trees, which are exacerbated by modern processors' wider and deeper memory hierarchies.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that merge at least three sorted data sequences using a cascade of data processing stages connected by a single feed-forward data path, allowing for efficient merging regardless of distribution skew and reducing implementation overheads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If parallel merge trees are used for K-way merging, then the number of merging passes through memory is reduced by a factor of log2K, but the tournament state scales at least O(K) and flow management overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of merging passesVSAvoidtournament state and flow management overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the K-way merging problem into multiple 2-way merging stages. Instead of implementing a complex K-way merge tree with O(K) state, the invention divides the K input lists into groups and performs sequential 2-way merges at each stage. This segmentation reduces the tournament state requirement from O(K) to O(1) per stage while achieving the same log2K reduction in merging passes through the multi-stage approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If K-way merging is implemented with increased tournament state, then merging passes are reduced, but utilization issues cause tournaments to become compute and/or latency bound

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemerging passes through memoryVSAvoidcompute and latency time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic action by implementing multiple 2-way merging stages that operate in sequence. Each stage processes a subset of the K lists through repeated 2-way merges, creating a periodic pattern of merge operations. This approach maintains high utilization by keeping the tournament state minimal and avoiding the compute/latency bottlenecks that occur in single-stage K-way merges, while still achieving the log2K reduction in total merging passes through the staged periodic operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If parallel merge trees have multiple processing elements, then throughput increases, but distribution skew causes biased merge node consumption and severe throughput hindrance

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidresilience to distribution skew
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the merging process adaptive to distribution skew through multiple 2-way merging stages. At each stage, the algorithm dynamically selects which lists to merge based on current data characteristics, rather than following a fixed merge tree structure. This dynamic approach allows the system to handle skewed distributions effectively while maintaining high throughput across multiple processing elements, as each stage can adjust to the actual data distribution encountered.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If deep buffering, backpressure signaling, and rate converters are added to PMT channels, then distribution skew is accommodated, but implementation overhead and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of distribution skewVSAvoidflow management overheads
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex flow management mechanisms (deep buffering, backpressure signaling, rate converters) from the merging architecture and replaces them with simple 2-way merging stages. By taking out these complicated components and using straightforward sequential 2-way merges instead, the invention achieves adaptability to distribution skew through the staged approach without incurring the heavy implementation overhead of sophisticated flow management systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20260064363A1Data merging using a single feed-forward data path between consecutive data processing stages
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20260064363A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064363A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064363A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Sorting data in memory is a fundamental computation that facilitates a wide range of search and query problems, aids in the construction and manipulation of data structures, and can improve the spatial and temporal locality of data and computation. Oftentimes, merge-based designs are used for sorting data, where a block sorting pass is performed followed by merging passes that produce increasingly larger sorted sublists until only a single list remains. While conventional merge-based designs can support multiple (K) merge operations in a single pass, a balance must be struck since there exists a point where K-scaling is no longer profitable. The present disclosure provides an alternative merge-based design in which data is merged using a single feed-forward data path.