Automated Feed-Growing Trays With Siphon Drain and Vertical Racks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for growing, harvesting, and distributing animal feed involve long-distance transportation, which leads to freshness issues, are dependent on unpredictable environmental factors, inefficient use of space, and lack scalability.

Innovation Solution

A system with automated trays, racks, and robots for growing and harvesting feed in a closed climate-controlled environment, utilizing a robot to deliver and retrieve trays, a harvester to remove living matter, and a seeder to distribute seed, with an electronic controller for autonomous operation, enabling efficient and scalable production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If feed is grown outdoors in the ground and distributed over long distances, then transportation and distribution are simplified, but feed freshness is lost and quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed freshnessVSAvoiddistribution system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the feed production process into modular trays that can be independently grown, harvested, and transported. Each tray is a self-contained unit that maintains feed freshness during transport, eliminating the need for complex distribution systems while preserving quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional horizontal ground-based farming to vertical rack-mounted tray systems. This dimensional change allows feed to be grown in three-dimensional space, reducing transportation distance and maintaining freshness while simplifying the distribution infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If feed is grown outdoors in the ground, then growing space is simplified, but space utilization efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilization efficiencyVSAvoidgrowing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system utilizes vertical space by mounting trays on multi-level racks, transforming traditional two-dimensional ground farming into three-dimensional vertical farming. This dramatically increases space utilization efficiency while maintaining relatively simple growing structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The tray system allows nested arrangement where multiple trays are stacked vertically on racks, with trays containing plants nested within the rack structure. This nesting approach maximizes space utilization without requiring complex growing equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Productivity

If conventional outdoor farming methods are used, then labor requirements are reduced, but scalability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidlabor requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates automated seeding mechanisms and self-watering tray designs that reduce manual labor requirements. Trays are self-contained with integrated drainage and watering systems that operate autonomously, enabling easy scaling without proportional increases in labor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The standardized tray design serves multiple functions: it contains the plants, provides structured watering and drainage, facilitates easy transport, and enables vertical stacking. This multi-functionality allows the system to scale efficiently with consistent operational procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If feed is grown in a controlled indoor environment with automation, then feed freshness and production predictability are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction predictabilityVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controlled environment system is segmented into independent, modular rack units with standardized trays. Each module can operate semi-autonomously, allowing the overall system to achieve production predictability through replication of proven modules rather than through monolithic complex automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system controls critical growth parameters (light, water, temperature) through standardized mechanisms in each tray and rack module. By maintaining consistent parameter control across replicated modules, the system achieves production predictability without requiring overly complex centralized control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250366409A1Apparatus, system, and method for growing and harvesting living matter
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 FOREVER FEED TECHNOLOGIES
  • US20250366409A1 patent drawing
  • US20250366409A1 patent drawing
  • US20250366409A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A tray for growing and harvesting living matter includes an open top, closed sides, and a closed bottom. The tray also includes an open interior cavity defined by the closed sides and a grow surface of the closed bottom. The tray additionally includes a siphon drain that is coupled to the grow surface of the closed bottom. The siphon drain includes a domed housing within the open interior cavity and vertically offset from the closed bottom such that a gap is defined between the domed housing and the closed bottom. The siphon drain also includes a stand pipe partially within the domed housing, extending through the closed bottom, having an upper opening within the domed housing, and having a lower opening below the closed bottom.