Wireless Feedback Latency Alignment for TTI Duration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing feedback processes due to latency between the Transmission Time Interval (TTI) and feedback opportunities, leading to delayed or incomplete feedback, which affects transmission efficiency and throughput.

Innovation Solution

The techniques involve determining TTI durations based on identified latency to ensure the receiving apparatus can prepare appropriate feedback, including selecting between transport block and code block level feedback, and modifying feedback when latency thresholds are not met, thereby optimizing feedback transmission during available opportunities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the TTI duration is extended to improve data transmission capacity, then the throughput increases, but the feedback preparation time becomes insufficient leading to delayed or lost feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidfeedback preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic TTI duration adjustment where the transmitting apparatus adapts the TTI length based on the receiving apparatus's processing capability and the current latency conditions. This allows the system to optimize between throughput and feedback preparation time by varying TTI duration rather than using a fixed value, resolving the contradiction between extended TTI for higher throughput and sufficient time for feedback preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the feedback opportunity is delayed to allow complete processing of long TTIs, then feedback accuracy improves, but the latency increases reducing system responsiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback accuracyVSAvoidfeedback latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs preliminary action by having the receiving apparatus begin feedback preparation as soon as possible during the TTI, rather than waiting until the TTI completes. The apparatus also performs early verification of whether the TTI duration will allow complete processing before the feedback opportunity arrives, enabling it to take corrective actions in advance such as requesting retransmission or adjusting expectations, thus maintaining feedback accuracy without excessive latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If the receiving apparatus processes all code blocks to ensure complete feedback, then feedback completeness improves, but the processing time exceeds the feedback opportunity window

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback completenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by allowing the receiving apparatus to process only a subset of code blocks or transport blocks within the available feedback preparation time. The apparatus determines which portions to prioritize based on importance and processing speed, accepting that some feedback may be incomplete rather than delaying beyond the feedback opportunity. This resolves the contradiction by achieving timely feedback with acceptable completeness rather than complete feedback that would miss the deadline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10637608B2Techniques for improving feedback processes based on a latency between a transmission time interval (TTI) and a feedback opportunity
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 QUALCOMM INC
  • US10637608B2 patent drawing
  • US10637608B2 patent drawing
  • US10637608B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are described for wireless communication. One method includes identifying a latency between a start of a transmission time interval (TTI) of a transmission burst and a feedback opportunity for the TTI, and determining a duration of the TTI based at least in part on the latency. Another method includes identifying a latency between an end of a TTI of a transmission burst and a feedback opportunity for the TTI, identifying a plurality of code blocks in the TTI, selecting one of a transport block level feedback or a code block level feedback for the TTI based at least in part on the latency, and transmitting the selected one of the transport block level feedback or the code block level feedback for the TTI during the feedback opportunity.