Feedback-Based Communication Router for Contact Centers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing contact center routing systems for text-based communications often fail to accurately route communications to the appropriate resources due to outdated predefined rules, requiring frequent updates and not leveraging feedback effectively.

Innovation Solution

Implement a system where inbound communications are classified based on feedback from prior interactions, allowing for dynamic routing to different contact center queues based on agent feedback, user feedback, and historical communication data, with the use of a communication classifier that learns from feedback to generate new routing rules over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If predefined rules are used for routing text-based communications, then routing can be implemented with basic infrastructure, but routing accuracy deteriorates and frequent rule updates are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting accuracyVSAvoidrule update frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where routing outcomes are continuously monitored and fed back to the machine learning model. The model learns from actual routing results, agent performance data, and communication outcomes to automatically refine routing decisions, eliminating the need for manual rule updates while improving accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The routing system performs self-optimization through the machine learning model that automatically adjusts routing parameters and decisions based on learned patterns from historical data. The system serves itself by continuously improving without external intervention, replacing manual rule maintenance with autonomous adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If feedback-based dynamic routing is implemented, then routing accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it classifies communications, determines routing decisions, learns from feedback, and adapts to changing patterns. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems for classification, decision-making, and optimization into a single unified component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model acts as an intermediary layer between raw communication data and routing execution. It processes input communications, applies learned patterns, and outputs routing decisions, mediating between the complexity of data analysis and the simplicity of routing execution while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional SBR with predefined rules is used, then system implementation is straightforward, but adaptability to new communication patterns deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to communication patternsVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system transitions from static predefined rules to dynamic machine learning-based decisions. The model continuously adapts to new communication patterns, agent availability, and routing outcomes, making the system flexible and responsive to changing conditions rather than rigid and fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters from fixed rule definitions to learned probability distributions and decision boundaries. The machine learning model adjusts routing parameters dynamically based on input features and historical patterns, enabling adaptation to new communication types and patterns without structural changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11089159B2Feedback based communication router
Publication Date: 2021.08.10 AVAYA INC
  • US11089159B2 patent drawing
  • US11089159B2 patent drawing
  • US11089159B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inbound communication is received by a contact center. For example, the inbound communication may be a text-based communication. The inbound communication is classified based on feedback from one or more prior inbound communications. For example, the feedback may be based on whether a previous communication was transferred, was dropped, based on feedback provided by a contact center agent, based on feedback provided by a user, and/or the like. In response to classifying the first inbound communication, the inbound communication is routed differently in the contact center. For example, the inbound communication is routed to a different contact center queue based on the feedback of the previous communication.