Autonomous Feeder Domain Slave Station Fault Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current feeder automation systems face high bandwidth requirements for communication channels, delayed fault responses due to centralized architecture, and complex reconfiguration challenges, especially in large networks.

Innovation Solution

A method where slave stations in different domains operate tie-switches, with one slave station directly controlling real tie-switches and another controlling virtual tie-switches, allowing independent fault detection, isolation, and power restoration without a master station, reducing communication demands and simplifying reconfiguration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized architecture with master station is used for feeder automation, then system control and coordination are improved, but communication bandwidth requirements increase and response time to faults increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem controlVSAvoidfault response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the feeder automation system into multiple autonomous domains, each managed by a slave station that can independently perform fault detection, isolation, and service restoration. This segmentation eliminates the single point of control (master station) and enables parallel autonomous operation across domains, significantly reducing fault response time while maintaining system reliability through distributed intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each slave station is equipped with autonomous decision-making capabilities to detect faults, isolate them, and restore service without requiring master station intervention. The slave stations self-manage their respective domains by exchanging minimal information with neighboring stations, eliminating communication delays to the master station and enabling immediate local response to faults.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If a centralized architecture with master station is used for feeder automation, then system control and coordination are improved, but communication bandwidth requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem controlVSAvoidcommunication bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into autonomous domains where each slave station manages its own domain independently. This eliminates the need for all communication traffic to pass through the master station, dramatically reducing the communication bandwidth burden on the master station and its communication channels while maintaining system control through distributed autonomous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Slave stations autonomously handle fault detection, isolation, and service restoration within their domains without requiring continuous communication with the master station. Only minimal status information and coordination messages are exchanged between neighboring slave stations, reducing overall communication bandwidth requirements compared to the centralized architecture where all data must be transmitted to the master station.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If fault information is broadcast to all FTUs in the network, then fault detection capability is improved, but communication traffic between FTUs increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detectionVSAvoidcommunication traffic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements domain-based autonomous operation where fault detection and information exchange are localized to specific domains rather than being broadcast network-wide. Each slave station independently monitors its domain and exchanges information only with neighboring slave stations, maintaining comprehensive fault detection capability while minimizing communication traffic to essential local exchanges only.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Extent of automation

If each FTU needs to know overall feeder configuration for autonomous operation, then fault isolation capability is improved, but system reconfiguration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault isolationVSAvoidreconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent assigns each slave station knowledge of only its own domain configuration rather than requiring all FTUs to know the complete feeder configuration. This localized knowledge approach enables effective fault isolation within each domain while dramatically reducing reconfiguration complexity, as changes in one domain do not require updates to all FTUs across the entire network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2308149B1Feeder automation system and method for operating the same
Publication Date: 2017.08.30 ABB RES LTD
  • EP2308149B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2308149B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2308149B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A feeder automation system and a method for operating the feeder automation system. The system comprises a first domain comprising a first slave station, a second domain comprising a second slave station, and a tie-switch provided between the first domain and the second domain. The first slave station is adapted to operate the tie-switch directly, and the second slave station is adapted to operate the tie-switch through the first slave station. When a fault occurs in the system, the first slave station and the second slave station cooperate with each other to perform fault detection, fault isolation and fault restoration etc. without interacting with a master station.