Real-Time Feeder Reconfiguration for Load Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing feeder reconfiguration systems in utility distribution fail to achieve real-time load balancing, leading to overloading of transformers and feeders, and lack normalization of load across equipment, which reduces system reliability.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for real-time feeder reconfiguration that defines an objective function to minimize load deviation across transformers and feeders, using System Load Index (SLI) and load indices to optimize the operation of sectionalizing switches, allowing for efficient load transfer between overloaded and lightly loaded feeders and transformers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional feeder reconfiguration methods are used, then system reliability is maintained through overload protection, but real-time load balancing cannot be achieved and equipment overloading occurs during peak periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidload balancing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic feeder reconfiguration that adapts to changing load conditions in real-time. The system continuously monitors load variations and automatically reconfigures feeders based on current conditions, transitioning from static to dynamic operation to prevent overloading while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring electrical parameters (current, voltage, power flow) and using this information to make real-time reconfiguration decisions. The feedback loop enables the system to detect overload conditions and automatically initiate load transfer to balanced feeders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If load transfer is performed manually to balance feeders, then operator control is maintained, but response time is insufficient for real-time load balancing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator controlVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service operation by automatically detecting overload conditions, calculating optimal reconfiguration strategies, and executing load transfer without manual intervention. The automated system serves itself by making real-time decisions based on monitored parameters, eliminating the time delay associated with manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating reconfiguration strategies and preparing load transfer paths before overload conditions occur. The system proactively reconfigures feeders based on predicted load patterns, preventing overloading before it happens rather than reacting after the fact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If complex network flow programming techniques are used for reconfiguration, then optimal steady state can be achieved, but system complexity increases and real-time control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimal steady state achievementVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex reconfiguration problem into manageable components: load monitoring, overload detection, feeder selection, and switch operation. By dividing the system into modular functional blocks, the complexity is reduced while maintaining the ability to achieve optimal steady states through coordinated operation of individual segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system simplifies control by focusing on key parameters (load magnitude, feeder capacity, switch states) rather than attempting to optimize all system variables simultaneously. By changing and monitoring critical parameters, the system achieves real-time control without requiring complex network flow programming for every decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If heuristic techniques are used for reconfiguration, then near-optimal solutions can be reached quickly, but normalization of load across all equipment cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconfiguration speedVSAvoidload normalization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal reconfiguration framework that simultaneously achieves multiple objectives: preventing overloading, balancing load across feeders, and normalizing load distribution across all equipment. The system performs multiple functions through a single integrated approach, ensuring comprehensive load management rather than partial optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes to transition from near-optimal to fully normalized load distribution. By adjusting switch states and reconfiguring feeder connections based on normalized load indices, the system achieves complete load normalization while maintaining the speed benefits of heuristic techniques through efficient calculation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2406863B1System and method for real-time feeder reconfiguration for load balancing in distribution system automation
Publication Date: 2017.11.15 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • EP2406863B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2406863B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2406863B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method for real-time feeder reconfiguration for load balancing in distribution system automation is provided. The load balancing of transformers and feeders is achieved by means of load transfer from an overloaded transformer or feeder to an adjacent transformer or feeder which is lightly loaded. The method comprises of defining an objective function as the sum of squares of the load deviation of transformers/feeders. The minimization of this objective function determines the optimal operating states (open or closed) of sectionalizing switches. The load balancing operation of transformer and feeder is carried out by a single operation in which a plurality of switches is reconfigured.