Component Feeder Selection for Simultaneous Pickup After Shortage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing component mounting devices require pre-attachment of multiple feeders and struggle with efficient component mounting when component shortages occur, as they need to determine the next feeder position based on the original feeder's position, leading to inefficiencies and potential component expiration.

Innovation Solution

A determination device that acquires and analyzes the attachment positions and types of multiple component feeders to dynamically determine which feeder can supply a specific component type when shortages occur, allowing simultaneous pickup by the mounting head, and includes mechanisms to change feeder positions to prevent component expiration and maintain production efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple component feeders are attached in advance to the feeder holding section, then the mounting head can simultaneously pick up components from multiple feeders, but when component shortage occurs in a specific feeder, the system cannot efficiently determine which alternative feeder to use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent mounting efficiencyVSAvoidfeeder substitution capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary registration of multiple component feeders, storing their attachment positions and component types in advance. When component shortage occurs, the determination device quickly identifies suitable alternative feeders from the pre-registered information, avoiding time-consuming search and enabling rapid feeder substitution while maintaining simultaneous pickup capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically determines which feeder to use based on real-time component availability rather than following a fixed feeder assignment. The determination device evaluates multiple factors including attachment position, component type compatibility, and current component levels to flexibly select the most appropriate alternative feeder, optimizing productivity under varying conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If the attachment position of the next feeder is determined based on the original feeder's position, then the system can maintain a fixed feeder arrangement, but this limits the ability to utilize feeders attached at different positions when component shortages occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeeder arrangement stabilityVSAvoidfeeder position flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static feeder assignment based on fixed position relationships to a dynamic determination process. The determination device evaluates all registered feeders' attachment positions and component types, selecting alternatives based on current needs rather than predetermined position-based rules, thereby achieving both stability in operation and flexibility in adaptation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the selection criteria from fixed positional parameters to flexible parameters including component type compatibility, attachment position availability, and current component levels. This allows the system to adapt feeder selection based on varying operational conditions while maintaining stable simultaneous pickup operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If component feeders are not pre-attached and positioned optimally, then the system can avoid component expiration by flexible arrangement, but the mounting head cannot efficiently perform simultaneous pickup operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimultaneous pickup efficiencyVSAvoidcomponent expiration risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary attachment and registration of multiple component feeders with their specific positions and component types stored in advance. This enables the mounting head to execute efficient simultaneous pickup operations while the determination device monitors component levels and proactively determines alternative feeders before component expiration occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors component levels in each feeder and provides feedback to the determination device. When component levels approach depletion, the system uses the pre-registered feeder information to identify and switch to alternative feeders, preventing component expiration while maintaining optimal simultaneous pickup efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11937376B2Determination device and component mounting apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 FUJI CORP
  • US11937376B2 patent drawing
  • US11937376B2 patent drawing
  • US11937376B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A determination device determines a component feeder to be used from among the multiple component feeders attached to a feeder holding section. When a first specific type of component is supplied from a first specific component feeder, a second specific type of component supplied from a second specific component feeder are simultaneously picked up by a mounting head, and a component shortage occurs in the first specific component feeder, the determination device determines a same type component feeder attached to a position which enables simultaneous pickup with the second specific type of component supplied from the second specific component feeder, as a component feeder for supplying the first specific type of component.