Sewing Machine Feeder Stroke Compensation Algorithm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Sewing machines often produce misshapen or improperly sized stitches due to feeding errors between the feed dog and fabric, which are influenced by various factors such as fabric type, thread tension, and machine conditions, leading to inconsistent seam quality.

Innovation Solution

A feeder movement compensation algorithm that calculates and adjusts the feed dog's stroke length, height, and path based on calibration data, including operator inputs, machine measurements, and stored error data to achieve the desired stitch size and shape, ensuring consistent fabric positioning during sewing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If standard feed dog movement is used, then the sewing machine operates with simple mechanism, but feeding errors occur causing misshapen stitches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestitch consistencyVSAvoidfeeder mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration by sewing test seams and measuring actual stitch dimensions before production sewing. The measured deviations are stored and used to pre-calculate modified feed dog movements that compensate for machine-specific errors, eliminating the need for complex real-time adjustment mechanisms during production sewing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system measures actual stitch dimensions during calibration, compares them to target dimensions, and uses this feedback to calculate correction factors. These corrections are applied to modify the feed dog movement profile, creating a closed-loop system that compensates for mechanical imperfections without adding complex adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If feed dog movement is modified to compensate for errors, then stitch consistency improves, but the control algorithm becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabric positioning accuracyVSAvoidcontrol algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex calculations are performed once during preliminary calibration to determine correction factors for feed dog position, stitch length, and stitch width. These pre-calculated correction values are stored and simply applied during production sewing, avoiding the need for complex real-time computations while maintaining high positioning accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system modifies specific parameters of the feed dog movement profile (position, velocity, acceleration) based on pre-calculated correction factors. By changing these motion parameters rather than the overall control architecture, the system achieves accurate fabric positioning with relatively simple control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If calibration is performed for different fabrics and conditions, then adaptability improves, but calibration time and data storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabric type adaptabilityVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration system performs multiple measurements (stitch length, stitch width, fabric feed distance) during a single calibration seam, and the same calibration data is used to correct multiple stitch types and sewing conditions. This multi-functional approach achieves broad fabric and condition adaptability without requiring separate calibration procedures for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs calibration at a slightly excessive level by measuring multiple stitch dimensions and performing comprehensive error analysis, but this one-time thorough calibration provides long-term benefits across many sewing operations. The initial time investment is amortized over numerous production seams, reducing the effective time cost per stitch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8985038B2Feeder movement compensation
Publication Date: 2015.03.24 SINGER SOURCING LTD LLC
  • US8985038B2 patent drawing
  • US8985038B2 patent drawing
  • US8985038B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A feeder movement compensation algorithm for use within a processor controlled sewing machine. The sewing machine configured with a reciprocating needle and thread, and including a stitch plate upon which fabric to be sewn is positioned beneath the needle and thread. The machine also includes a feeder mechanism driving a feed dog thru a movement. The feed dog movement pushes the fabric along the stitch plate and the reciprocating needle and thread form stitches in the fabric. During the stitch cycle, the feed dog movement completes at least one feeder stroke. The feeder stroke includes a portion of the feed dog extending above the stitch plate and moving along the direction of feed. The feeder stroke thus pushes the fabric along the stitch plate. The compensation algorithm calculates a theoretical feeder stroke length based upon a desired stitch. The compensation algorithm then calculates a modified feeder stroke length using the theoretical feeder stroke length and at least one feeder calibration data element. The modified feeder stroke length is then performed by the feed dog during the stitch cycle to form the stitch.