Autonomous Feeding Device with Fallback Substitution Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automatic and autonomous animal feeding devices often experience breakdowns due to insufficient feed replenishment, leading to unnecessary operator intervention and device stoppages.

Innovation Solution

The feeding device incorporates a control system with fall-back information for each feed variety, allowing it to continue operating by replacing unavailable feed with alternatives, omitting non-essential components, or generating report messages instead of alarm signals, thus minimizing downtime and operator workload.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the feeding device operates autonomously without fall-back information, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability decreases when feed varieties run out

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice operation continuityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is pre-configured with fall-back information for multiple feed varieties before actual operation. When a feed variety runs out, the system immediately switches to pre-planned alternative varieties, eliminating the need for real-time operator intervention and maintaining continuous operation without requiring complex on-the-fly decision-making logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The feeding device autonomously manages feed variety substitutions by automatically detecting when a feed variety is depleted and independently switching to alternative varieties based on pre-stored fall-back information. This self-service capability eliminates the need for operator intervention while maintaining reliable operation, balancing device complexity with reliability improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If the device generates alarm signals for every feed shortage, then the operator is notified immediately, but the operator workload increases and device stoppage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed replenishment monitoringVSAvoiddevice operational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of generating alarm signals for every feed shortage (which would increase operator workload and cause device stoppage), the system converts these potentially harmful notifications into beneficial silent substitutions. When a feed variety runs out, the system automatically replaces it with an alternative from fall-back information without notifying the operator, thereby maintaining continuous operation and improving productivity while still ensuring reliable feed replenishment monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The fall-back information acts as an intermediary between the feed kitchen inventory status and the feeding device operation. Rather than directly alarming the operator when feed is depleted, the fall-back information mediates the situation by providing pre-planned alternative varieties that enable automatic substitution, thus eliminating the need for operator intervention and maintaining device productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If the device stops when feed varieties are insufficient, then the feed composition accuracy is maintained, but the device downtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed composition accuracyVSAvoiddevice downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of stopping completely when a feed variety is depleted (which would maintain strict feed composition accuracy but cause device downtime), the system applies partial action by substituting the depleted variety with alternative varieties from fall-back information. This allows the feeding device to continue operating with modified feed composition, thereby reducing downtime while maintaining acceptable feed composition accuracy through controlled substitutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11122770B2Automatic feed composing device
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 LELY PATENT NV
  • US11122770B2 patent drawing
  • US11122770B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automatic and autonomous feeding device comprising a feed kitchen having different feed varieties and a feed fetching device, and a control system for executing a feed composing cycle including receipt or generation of a feed order and controlling of the feed fetching device to fetch feed from the feed kitchen according to the feed order in order to compose a feed mixture, and comprising a feed determining device configured to deteiiiiine quantity information of the feed varieties, wherein the control device further contains fall-back information, for at least one feed variety, which fall-back information specifies what action the feeding device, during and/or after execution of a feed composing cycle, needs to perform if the feed determining device determines that that quantity of this feed variety which is desired in the feed order is greater than the available quantity.