FEM Coordination via SPMI Discarding Corrupted RSSI

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The sharing of a front-end module (FEM) among different chipsets in electronic devices for RF communications leads to reduced signal quality due to ineffective coordination of gain adjustments across various communication protocols, resulting in erroneous Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) values and distorted RF signals.

Innovation Solution

A processor coordinates the operations of the FEM by using a Single-Phase Multiple Initiator (SPMI) indicator to discard corrupted RSSI values and use the last stored valid RSSI value for accurate gain adjustments, ensuring better signal quality across different communication protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If a shared front-end module is used among different chipsets to preserve physical space, then device compactness is improved, but signal quality deteriorates due to uncoordinated gain adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical spaceVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the first chipset provides feedback about its gain adjustment operations to the processor, which then coordinates with the second chipset's operations. This feedback loop enables the system to maintain signal quality despite sharing the FEM by continuously monitoring and adjusting based on actual signal conditions and coordination status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The processor acts as an intermediary between the first and second chipsets, coordinating their access to the shared FEM. It receives operations from both chipsets, determines coordination status, and manages the FEM access accordingly. This intermediary role enables the system to preserve signal quality by mediating between different chipset operations that would otherwise conflict.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If gain adjustments are made without coordination between chipsets, then operational flexibility is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to erroneous RSSI values

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidRSSI value accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary coordination actions before gain adjustments are applied. The processor determines whether operations from different chipsets are coordinated before allowing them to proceed. This preliminary check prevents erroneous RSSI values from being generated in the first place, maintaining measurement precision while still allowing operational flexibility when coordination is established.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Feedback mechanisms enable the system to monitor coordination status and adjust operations accordingly. When coordination is detected, the system allows gain adjustments to proceed; when not coordinated, it prevents operations that would generate erroneous RSSI values. This feedback loop maintains measurement precision while preserving operational flexibility through adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple communication protocols share the FEM concurrently, then device versatility is improved, but signal quality deteriorates due to distorted RF signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol supportVSAvoidsignal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts FEM access based on the operational state of different communication protocols. The processor determines coordination status in real-time and dynamically controls which chipset can access the FEM at any given moment. This dynamic control enables multiple protocols to share the FEM without signal distortion, as access is granted only when protocols are coordinated or when one protocol has exclusive access rights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The processor serves as an intermediary that manages interactions between multiple communication protocols sharing the FEM. It receives operations from different protocols, determines their coordination status, and mediates FEM access accordingly. This intermediary function enables the system to support multiple protocols while maintaining signal quality through coordinated access management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20220352910A1Coordination of communication protocols using a shared front-end module
Publication Date: 2022.11.03 APPLE INC
  • US20220352910A1 patent drawing
  • US20220352910A1 patent drawing
  • US20220352910A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A circuit component may determine whether first signal indicative of at least one of the plurality of communication interface circuits accessing the FEM during a respective communication slot associated with the FEM has been received, determine a first Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) value for the respective communication slot used by the FEM based on data associated with the respective communication slot, and store the first RSSI value in response to the first signal not being received. The circuit component may then determine a first gain for a subsequent slot based on the first RSSI value and discard the first RSSI value in response to the first signal being received.