Factory Energy Management Network Configuration via Adaptability Matrix

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing factory energy management systems (FEMS) face challenges in efficiently configuring networks for energy monitoring and management due to the limitations of wired communication in industrial environments, which are often affected by external factors like metal, dust, and vibration, and lack an optimal approach to select suitable communication schemes for different processes.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for configuring a network of a FEMS by generating a communication adaptability matrix based on a communication characteristic matrix and a correlation matrix, which involves setting parameters such as low OPEX, CAPEX, flexibility, data rate, reliability, and latency, and determining the most suitable communication scheme for each process using these matrices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If wired communication is used for resource/device monitoring and control in factories, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and installation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidnetwork configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the communication parameter from wired to wireless, transforming the physical connection state while maintaining communication reliability through protocol optimization and error correction mechanisms designed for wireless environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal communication framework that can handle multiple communication schemes (wired and wireless) through a unified configuration approach, allowing the system to adapt to different process requirements without requiring separate configuration methodologies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Stability of the object's composition

If wired communication is used in industrial environments with metal, dust, and vibration, then stability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication stabilityVSAvoidnetwork configuration ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational parameter from physical connection to wireless communication, eliminating the need for manual cable handling and physical network setup while maintaining stable communication through robust wireless protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automatic network configuration where the system self-optimizes communication parameters and selects appropriate communication schemes without requiring manual intervention, making the system easier to operate while maintaining stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If a single communication scheme is used for all processes, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication scheme simplicityVSAvoidcommunication scheme adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the communication system into process-specific communication schemes, allowing different communication methods to be applied to different processes based on their specific requirements, thereby achieving adaptability without significantly increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic communication configuration where the system can adaptively select and switch between different communication schemes based on real-time process requirements, maintaining simplicity through automated decision-making while achieving high adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of time

If communication schemes are selected without systematic analysis, then configuration time is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork configuration timeVSAvoidcommunication scheme selection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis and evaluation of communication schemes before final selection, using systematic criteria to pre-assess the suitability of different communication methods for each process, thereby ensuring accurate selection without extending the actual configuration time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system evaluates the performance and suitability of communication schemes based on process requirements and selects the optimal scheme, ensuring precise selection through systematic analysis while maintaining efficient configuration timing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12003381B2Apparatus and method for configuring network of factory energy management system
Publication Date: 2024.06.04 ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST
  • US12003381B2 patent drawing
  • US12003381B2 patent drawing
  • US12003381B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The method for configuring the network of a factory energy management system (FEMS) includes receiving a parameter set for configuration of the network, generating a diagram based on a characteristic for the parameter of each of communication schemes available for configuration of the network, determining, based on the diagram, a communication characteristic matrix including a characteristic value representing the characteristic for the parameter of each of the communication schemes, determining a correlation matrix representing a weight for the parameter in each process to be managed by the FEMS, deriving a communication adaptability matrix by applying the weight corresponding to the parameter for each process of the correlation matrix to the characteristic value for the parameter of each of the communication schemes included in the communication characteristic matrix, and determining a communication scheme to be applied for each process from among the communication schemes using the communication adaptability matrix.