Fermentation Foam Prediction Using Image-Based ML Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fermentation processes face challenges in monitoring and controlling foaming, which can lead to reduced productivity and contamination risks due to the introduction of antifoam agents, and existing methods lack efficient automated solutions for predicting and mitigating foaming issues.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of machine learning algorithms for detecting and predicting foaming levels using image data from bioreactors, allowing for automated adjustments in process conditions such as airflow, pressure, and agitation speed to prevent or mitigate foaming, thereby reducing the need for antifoam agents and minimizing contamination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If antifoam agents are introduced to control foaming, then foaming is suppressed, but contamination risk increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefoamingVSAvoidcontamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model predicts foaming events before they occur by analyzing real-time sensor data from the fermentation process. This early prediction allows the system to take preventive action by adjusting operational parameters (agitation speed, aeration rate, pH) before foaming becomes severe, thereby avoiding the need to introduce antifoam agents and eliminating contamination risk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the chemical method of foaming control (antifoam agents) with a mechanical/control-based approach. The machine learning system continuously monitors process parameters and automatically adjusts operational conditions to prevent foaming, substituting chemical intervention with intelligent process control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If antifoam agents are used to mitigate foaming, then foaming is reduced, but the amount of substance used increases and cost rises

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefoamingVSAvoidantifoam agent consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary prediction of foaming events using machine learning algorithms that analyze real-time sensor data. By predicting foaming before it occurs, the system can prevent foaming through operational parameter adjustments, thereby eliminating or significantly reducing the need for antifoam agent consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If manual monitoring and control of foaming is performed, then flexibility is maintained, but productivity decreases due to labor requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoaming controlVSAvoidfermentation productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation where the machine learning model continuously monitors process parameters, predicts foaming events, and automatically adjusts operational parameters without human intervention. This automated closed-loop control eliminates manual monitoring requirements while maintaining effective foaming control, thereby maximizing fermentation productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs real-time feedback control by continuously monitoring sensor data from the fermentation process, comparing actual conditions with predicted conditions, and automatically adjusting operational parameters to prevent foaming. This automated feedback loop replaces manual monitoring and enables continuous optimal operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Object-affected harmful factors

If complex monitoring systems are implemented to predict foaming, then foaming control improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoaming prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model serves multiple functions: it predicts foaming events, identifies optimal operational parameters, and guides process adjustments. By using a single multi-functional AI system rather than multiple specialized devices, the patent achieves accurate foaming prediction while minimizing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical and chemical foaming control systems with an intelligent software-based machine learning model. This substitution reduces physical device complexity while maintaining or improving foaming prediction accuracy through data-driven insights

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20220290090A1Automated control and prediction for a fermentation system
Publication Date: 2022.09.15 CULTURE BIOSCIENCES INC
  • US20220290090A1 patent drawing
  • US20220290090A1 patent drawing
  • US20220290090A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides methods and systems for foam control. A method of foam control for a fermentation system comprises: obtaining image data from an imaging device located at the fermentation system; and processing said sensor data using a trained machine learning algorithm to generate an output that indicates presence of foam or level of foaming.