Fermenter Pressure Gradient Insulator Contamination Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The production of biologically active compounds through fermentation poses a risk of contamination and exposure to aerosols, as the relative low pressure in the working chamber allows particles and germs to infiltrate, potentially harming personnel and compromising the integrity of the biologically active material.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus with a pressure gradient is designed, featuring a fermenter within an insulator that is connected to a working chamber via a pressure sluice, where the insulator maintains a low pressure and the working chamber maintains a higher pressure relative to ambient, with HEPA filters in air ducts to minimize germ contamination, and separate insulators for fermentation and purification steps at controlled temperatures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a low pressure is maintained in the working chamber to prevent contamination, then the risk of aerosol infiltration increases, but maintaining high pressure to prevent infiltration complicates the system design and energy consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontamination preventionVSAvoidpressure control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into multiple pressure zones: the first chamber (fermenter) operates at overpressure relative to the second chamber (working chamber), while the second chamber operates at overpressure relative to the ambient environment. This segmentation allows each zone to have optimized pressure control, preventing both contamination and aerosol infiltration without requiring a single complex pressure control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second chamber acts as an intermediary zone between the first chamber (fermenter) and the ambient environment. It buffers pressure differences and provides an additional barrier against contamination and aerosol infiltration, simplifying the overall pressure control requirements by distributing pressure management across multiple zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If manual operations are performed in the working chamber, then operational flexibility is maintained, but exposure to aerosols and biological materials increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual operation flexibilityVSAvoidaerosol exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The second chamber serves as a protective intermediary zone that allows manual operations to be performed with flexibility while preventing direct exposure to aerosols and biological materials from the first chamber. The pressure gradient and physical barrier provided by this intermediate chamber protect personnel while maintaining operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure difference that could potentially cause aerosol infiltration is converted into a protective feature. The overpressure in the first chamber relative to the second chamber ensures that aerosols are prevented from moving into the working chamber, turning a potential hazard into a safety mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If overpressure is maintained in the first chamber to prevent contamination, then sterility is ensured, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesterility maintenanceVSAvoidpressure maintenance energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure maintenance requirement is segmented across two chambers with different pressure levels. The first chamber maintains overpressure relative to the second chamber for sterility, while the second chamber maintains overpressure relative to the ambient environment for personnel protection. This segmentation allows each chamber to use energy only for its specific pressure differential, reducing total energy consumption compared to maintaining one large pressure differential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This setup effectively prevents contamination of biologically active materials from the environment and reduces exposure of personnel to aerosols, ensuring operational safety while maintaining efficient production and purification processes.

Implementation Method 1

a pressure gradient in relation to ambient pressure prevails in both the insulator and in the working chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

HEPA filters in air ducts to minimize germ contamination

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 3

separate insulators for fermentation and purification steps at controlled temperatures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Data Source

PatentUS7927836B2Device and method for the production of biologically active compounds by fermentation
Publication Date: 2011.04.19 MERZ PHARMA GMBH & CO KGAA

AI summary

The present invention relates to a process and an apparatus for the fermentational production of biologically active materials, wherein a fermenter is located in an insulator which, in turn, is located within a working chamber or is adjacent to it. A pressure gradient in relation to ambient pressure prevails in both the insulator and in the working chamber.