Ferrate Synthesis via Controlled Peroxidation and Natural Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for synthesizing ferrate face challenges such as high power consumption, low yield, poor stability, and complexity in industrial production, limiting its large-scale application and use in water treatment.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a controlled mixture of iron salts, activating agents, and oxidizing agents, heated to 30-398°C, followed by natural cooling and mixing with water, to produce ferrate in liquid form with high yield and purity, reducing the risk of explosion and simplifying the process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If hypochlorite oxidation method is used, then yield and purity are improved, but operation complexity increases and temperature control difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveferrate purityVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter from near-zero (hypochlorite method) to room temperature or slightly elevated temperatures, simplifying operation while maintaining high purity (95%+) through the specific peroxidation reaction mechanism that is inherently selective at these temperatures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for complex temperature control systems and ice baths required by hypochlorite oxidation, achieving the same high purity result through a different chemical pathway that operates naturally at simpler conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If electrolysis method is used, then operation simplicity is improved, but power consumption increases and yield decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the electrolysis mechanical/electrical system with a chemical peroxidation system, substituting electrical energy input with chemical reaction energy, thereby eliminating high power consumption while maintaining operational simplicity and achieving higher yield

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the energy input parameter from electrical (electrolysis) to chemical (peroxide oxidation), fundamentally altering the energy pathway to reduce power consumption while preserving the simplicity of the process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If high temperature peroxidation is used, then yield is improved, but explosion risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveferrate yieldVSAvoidexplosion risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the temperature parameter to a moderate range (room temperature to slightly elevated) rather than high temperature, achieving high yield through controlled peroxidation kinetics while eliminating explosion risk by staying below the decomposition threshold of peroxides

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs beforehand cushioning by controlling reaction conditions (temperature, concentration, additives) to prevent runaway reactions and peroxide decomposition, ensuring high yield is achieved through controlled kinetics rather than uncontrolled high-temperature reactions that would pose explosion hazards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Manufacturing precision

If complex synthetic methods are used, then ferrate purity is improved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveferrate purityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates complex purification steps, organic solvents, and multiple processing stages from traditional methods, achieving high purity ferrate directly through the selective peroxidation reaction that produces minimal by-products requiring no extensive purification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses inexpensive, readily available reagents (hydrogen peroxide, alkali metal salts, iron salts) in a single-step reaction that produces high-purity product directly, eliminating the need for expensive purification equipment, organic solvents, and multi-stage processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves high ferrate conversion efficiency, stability, and simplifies the production process, allowing for immediate use without further processing, with yields ranging from 60-95% and reduced production costs.

Implementation Method 1

a method of producing ferrate by oxidizing iron salts with an oxidizing agent in an alkaline medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

heating the iron salts, the activating agents and the alkalinizing agents to a temperature of 30 ̃398° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

Natural cooling the precursor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS9682870B2Method of synthesizing ferrate
Publication Date: 2017.06.20 HARBIN INST OF TECH
  • US9682870B2 patent drawing
  • US9682870B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of synthesizing ferrate, which includes the steps of: (a) weighing and obtaining iron salts, activating agents, alkalinizing agents and oxidizing agents solution; (b) mixing uniformly the iron salts, the activating agents and the alkalinizing agents, heating to 30˜398° C. and maintaining for 1 min˜60 min to obtain a mixture; (c) adding the oxidizing agents solution to the mixture with an adding time of less than 10 minutes, then obtaining a precursor; and (d) natural cooling the precursor, then mixing the precursor with water and stirring evenly to obtain a final product of ferrate, wherein a volume ratio of the precursor and the water is 1:1˜5. The method involves low power consumption, low temperature, low explosion risk, non-complicated steps and procedures, short synthetic time and high ferrate conversion efficiency. The method produces ferrate of high yield and good stability, and is suitable for producing ferrate composite pharmaceuticals in industrialized mass production.