Ferritic Stainless Steel High-Temperature Strength Workability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ferritic stainless steels face challenges in achieving optimal workability and high-temperature strength due to inadequate understanding of crystal grains and precipitates' influence on high-temperature properties, particularly in exhaust manifold applications where high-temperature exposure is common.

Innovation Solution

A ferritic stainless steel composition with specific weight percentages of C, N, Si, Mn, P, Cr, Mo, Nb, and W, along with a manufacturing method involving reheating, rough rolling, and controlled holding times to manage precipitate distribution and size, ensuring a high number of fine precipitates and sufficient solid solution W, is developed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If alloy elements such as Mo, Nb are added to improve high-temperature properties, then high-temperature strength is improved, but workability deteriorates due to excessive precipitate formation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh-temperature strengthVSAvoidworkability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the content ranges of alloy elements (C: 0.0005-0.02%, N: 0.005-0.02%, Si: 0.01-1.0%, Mn: 0.01-1.2%, P: 0.001-0.05%, Cr: 10.0-25.0%, Mo: 1.5-3.0%, Nb: 0.3-0.7%, W: 0.5-2.0%) and manufacturing parameters (reheating temperature: 1000-1300°C, holding time: 8000/(RHT-1000) to 120 seconds) to optimize the balance between high-temperature strength and workability. This systematic parameter optimization ensures sufficient solid solution W content while controlling precipitate formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing a controlled holding time period between rough rolling and finishing rolling, where the holding time is calculated as 8000/(RHT-1000) to 120 seconds. This preliminary holding period allows controlled precipitate formation and solid solution W content adjustment before the final rolling process, preventing excessive precipitate formation that would deteriorate workability while ensuring sufficient high-temperature strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If reheating temperature is increased to improve workability, then workability is improved, but precipitate coarsening occurs which reduces high-temperature strength

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveworkabilityVSAvoidhigh-temperature strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies continuity of useful action by maintaining a controlled thermal-mechanical process sequence: reheating at 1000-1300°C followed by rough rolling, then a controlled holding time of 8000/(RHT-1000) to 120 seconds, and finally finishing rolling. This continuous controlled process prevents precipitate coarsening while ensuring sufficient solid solution W content, achieving both good workability and high-temperature strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing a controlled holding time period between rough rolling and finishing rolling, where the holding time is calculated as 8000/(RHT-1000) to 120 seconds. This preliminary holding period allows controlled precipitate formation and solid solution W content adjustment before the final rolling process, preventing excessive precipitate formation that would deteriorate workability while ensuring sufficient high-temperature strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If the number of fine precipitates is increased to improve high-temperature strength, then high-temperature strength is improved, but workability deteriorates due to excessive precipitation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehigh-temperature strengthVSAvoidworkability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the content ranges of alloy elements (C: 0.0005-0.02%, N: 0.005-0.02%, Si: 0.01-1.0%, Mn: 0.01-1.2%, P: 0.001-0.05%, Cr: 10.0-25.0%, Mo: 1.5-3.0%, Nb: 0.3-0.7%, W: 0.5-2.0%) and manufacturing parameters (reheating temperature: 1000-1300°C, holding time: 8000/(RHT-1000) to 120 seconds) to optimize the balance between high-temperature strength and workability. This systematic parameter optimization ensures sufficient solid solution W content while controlling precipitate formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing a controlled holding time period between rough rolling and finishing rolling, where the holding time is calculated as 8000/(RHT-1000) to 120 seconds. This preliminary holding period allows controlled precipitate formation and solid solution W content adjustment before the final rolling process, preventing excessive precipitate formation that would deteriorate workability while ensuring sufficient high-temperature strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides enhanced workability and high-temperature strength, with room temperature elongation of 27% or more and 900°C tensile strength of 45 MPa or more, while preventing coarsening and excessive precipitate formation.

Implementation Method 1

reheating the slab including, in percent (%) by weight of the entire composition, C: 0.0005 to 0.02%, N: 0.005 to 0.02%, Si: 0.01 to 1.0%, Mn: 0.01 to 1.2%, P: 0.001 to 0.05%, Cr: 10.0 to 25.0%, Mo: 1.5 to 3.0%, Nb: 0.3 to 0.7%, W: 0.5 to 2.0%

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

control the composition and distribution of precipitates in the final material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Implementation Method 3

a holding time (seconds) before the start of finishing rolling of the rough rolled bar satisfies the following equation (1)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS12043875B2Ferrite-based stainless steel having excellent processability and high-temperature strength and method for manufacturing same
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 POHANG IRON & STEEL CO LTD
  • US12043875B2 patent drawing
  • US12043875B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a ferritic stainless steel with improved workability and high temperature strength through control of component composition and precipitate distribution, and a manufacturing method thereof. The ferritic stainless steel excellent in workability and high temperature strength according to an embodiment of the present disclosure includes, in percent (%) by weight of the entire composition, C: 0.0005 to 0.02%, N: 0.005 to 0.02%, Si: 0.01 to 1.0%, Mn: 0.01 to 1.2%, P: 0.001 to 0.05%, Cr: 10.0 to 25.0%, Mo: 1.5 to 3.0%, Nb: 0.3 to 0.7%, W: 0.5 to 2.0%, the remainder of iron (Fe) and other inevitable impurities, and the number of precipitates with an average diameter of 0.5 μm or less is 105 pieces/mm2 or less.