Ferritic Stainless Steel Sheet Deep Drawability via Crystal Orientation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ferritic stainless steel sheets with a thickness of 1.0 mm or more face challenges in developing adequate {111} grains for improved deep drawability due to reduced rolling reduction, and existing methods either compromise productivity or lead to defects like cracks during forming processes.

Innovation Solution

A ferritic stainless steel sheet with a specific chemical composition and production process involving hot-rolling, pickling, and cold-rolling without annealing, followed by controlled annealing to develop {111} and {322} crystal orientations, ensuring high workability and deep drawability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ferritic stainless steel sheet is used for exhaust system components, then cost is reduced compared to austenitic stainless steel, but workability and formability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidworkability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters by precisely controlling the content ranges of alloying elements (C: 0.001-0.020%, Si: 0.02-1.50%, Mn: 0.02-1.50%, Cr: 10.0-25.0%, Ti: 0.01-0.30%, Nb: 0-0.10%, and others). This parameter optimization enables ferritic stainless steel to achieve both cost-effectiveness and improved workability, resolving the contradiction between cost and formability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite microstructure consisting of ferrite phase with specific crystal orientations ({111} and/or {322} planes) and controlled grain size (5.0-15.0 μm). This composite microstructural design provides both the cost advantage of ferritic steel and the workability characteristics normally associated with more expensive austenitic steels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If rolling reduction is reduced for thick steel sheets (1.0 mm or more), then productivity is maintained, but adequate {111} grains cannot be developed for deep drawability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverolling efficiencyVSAvoiddeep drawability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters, particularly increasing Si content (0.02-1.50%) and Cr content (10.0-25.0%), which modify the recrystallization behavior during rolling. This enables {111} grain development even with reduced rolling reduction, maintaining both productivity and deep drawability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary microstructure control through optimized chemical composition before the rolling process. The controlled composition promotes preferential formation of {111} oriented grains during rolling, so that adequate deep drawability is achieved without requiring extensive rolling reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If conventional annealing processes are applied to improve workability, then deep drawability is enhanced, but productivity decreases due to additional process steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeep drawabilityVSAvoidnumber of processes
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the composition control and microstructure development into a single integrated rolling process. By optimizing the chemical composition, the desired ferritic microstructure with {111} orientation develops during the rolling operation itself, eliminating the need for separate annealing processes while maintaining deep drawability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention maintains continuous rolling without interrupting for separate annealing steps. The optimized composition enables the rolling process itself to continuously produce the desired microstructure, preserving productivity while achieving the workability improvements normally requiring additional heat treatment steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces a ferritic stainless steel sheet with enhanced deep drawability and workability, particularly for exhaust system components, while maintaining productivity and avoiding defects like cracks.

Implementation Method 1

a first crystal orientation intensity of a {111} plane and a second crystal orientation intensity of a {322} plane in a sheet thickness direction of the steel sheet satisfy predetermined relationships, wherein the steel sheet has a recrystallized fine grain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRecrystallization: Annealing

Data Source

PatentUS11643699B2Ferritic stainless steel sheet and production method thereof, and ferritic stainless member
Publication Date: 2023.05.09 NIPPON STEEL STAINLESS STEEL CORP
  • US11643699B2 patent drawing
  • US11643699B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A ferritic stainless steel sheet is provided that has a chemical composition consisting of, in mass %, C: 0.001 to 0.020%, Si: 0.02 to 1.50%, Mn: 0.02 to 1.50%, P: 0.01 to 0.05%, S: 0.0001 to 0.01%, Cr: 10.0 to 25.0%, Ti: 0.01 to 0.30%, N: 0.001 to 0.030%, and optional elements, with the balance being Fe and unavoidable impurities, wherein: a grain size number is 6 or more; the ferritic stainless steel sheet satisfies the formulas [A+B≥12.0/t], [X+Y≥12.0/(t−0.3)] and [(X+Y)−(A+B)≤5.0] with respect to crystal orientation intensities of a ferrite phase obtained by X-ray diffraction; and the sheet thickness is 1.0 mm or more.