Magnetic Coupling Sensing and Degaussing for Ferromagnetic Workpieces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic coupling devices used in robotics and industrial automation face challenges in providing real-time feedback on the status of ferromagnetic workpieces and ensuring proper magnetic retention, positioning, and degaussing functionality, which are essential for safe handling and processing.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic coupling tool equipped with a switchable magnetic flux source, magnetic field sensors, and a logic control circuit that determines operating states such as magnetic flux presence, workpiece proximity, and orientation, along with degaussing capabilities to manage residual magnetism, integrated into a robotic system for precise control and handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If magnetic coupling devices are used to secure ferromagnetic workpieces, then workpiece retention and handling capability are improved, but residual magnetism remains on the workpiece after release which can interfere with subsequent processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece retentionVSAvoidresidual magnetism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action through degaussing cycles that use alternating magnetic fields to progressively reduce residual magnetism on workpieces. The system performs repeated on-off cycling of magnetic flux with decreasing amplitude to eliminate harmful residual magnetism after workpiece handling, transforming the static residual magnetism problem into a dynamic elimination process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Loss of information

If sensors are added to provide real-time feedback on magnetic coupling status, then monitoring and control capability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time feedbackVSAvoidsensor integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multi-functionality by integrating sensors that serve multiple purposes: detecting workpiece presence, monitoring magnetic coupling status, determining workpiece orientation, and providing feedback for degaussing control. This universal sensing approach reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate dedicated sensors for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines sensing and control functions into an integrated system where magnetic field sensors are merged with the magnetic flux source and control circuitry. This consolidation allows the same magnetic field to be used both for workpiece handling and for sensing, reducing the number of separate components needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If degaussing capability is integrated into the magnetic coupling device, then residual magnetism removal is improved, but device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual magnetism removalVSAvoiddegaussing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the degaussing function with the existing magnetic coupling system by using the same magnetic flux source for both workpiece retention and degaussing operations. The control system switches between holding mode and degaussing mode, eliminating the need for separate degaussing hardware and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The degaussing function is implemented through periodic on-off cycling of the magnetic flux with decreasing amplitude. This periodic action allows the system to eliminate residual magnetism using the existing magnetic source without requiring continuous energy input or additional complex hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Manufacturing precision

If precise positioning and orientation control are implemented using sensors, then workpiece handling accuracy is improved, but measurement and detection difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidworkpiece orientation detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by using magnetic field sensors to continuously monitor workpiece position and orientation, then adjusting the magnetic flux distribution to achieve desired positioning. The control system processes sensor signals and provides real-time adjustments, creating a closed-loop system that improves measurement effectiveness through active control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical positioning and sensing systems with magnetic field-based detection and control. Instead of using mechanical encoders, cameras, or physical contact sensors, the system uses magnetic field distribution patterns to determine workpiece position and orientation, simplifying the detection mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables real-time monitoring and control of magnetic coupling processes, ensuring safe and efficient handling of ferromagnetic workpieces by providing accurate feedback on retention and positioning, and effectively removing residual magnetism, thus enhancing operational reliability and workpiece quality.

Implementation Method 1

A first magnetic field sensor of the plurality of magnetic field sensors positioned to monitor a first magnetic flux associated with the first workpiece engagement surface and a second magnetic field sensor of the plurality of magnetic field sensors positioned to monitor a second magnetic flux associated with the second workpiece engagement surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field detection: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

devices which use magnetic fields in order to attract and/or secure a ferromagnetic target to a working face of the device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction: Magnetism

Implementation Method 3

These sources include electromagnets, electro-permanent magnets, switchable permanent magnet units or arrangements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetism: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 4

a logic control circuit configured to perform a degaussing cycle with the plurality of electrical windings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11839954B2Magnetic coupling device with at least one of a sensor arrangement and a degauss capability
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 MAGSWITCH AUTOMATION CO
  • US11839954B2 patent drawing
  • US11839954B2 patent drawing
  • US11839954B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Magnetic coupling devices are disclosed having magnetic field sensors. The magnetic coupling device may include degaussing coils wrapped about pole extension shoes of the magnetic coupling device.