Ferrous PBF Alloy Composition for Hardness Without Cracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current metal 3D printing processes, specifically powder bed fusion, are limited in producing parts with high hardness (HV>370) due to issues like crack formation caused by thermal stresses and low toughness, restricting their application in industries requiring high strength, toughness, and corrosion resistance.

Innovation Solution

A method of layer-by-layer construction using an iron-based alloy with specific compositions of Cr, Mo, C, Ni, Cu, Nb, Si, and N, which provides a balance of high tensile strength, yield strength, elongation, and hardness, minimizing porosity and cracking, and allowing for heat treatment to enhance properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If higher hardness materials (HV>370) are used in PBF, then hardness and strength are improved, but crack formation increases due to thermal stresses and low toughness

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehardnessVSAvoidcrack formation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the chemical composition parameters of the steel alloy by adding specific amounts of alloying elements (Ni: 1.0-5.0 wt.%, Cu: 1.0-5.0 wt.%, Nb: 0.05-1.0 wt.%, Si: 0.05-1.0 wt.%, N: 0.05-0.25 wt.%) to achieve the desired balance between hardness and crack resistance. This compositional parameter change enables the material to form desirable phases that contribute to both hardness and toughness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite microstructure within the steel alloy by forming multiple phases including metal carbide and metal carbonitride phases through controlled alloying. This multi-phase composite structure provides both the hardness required for tooling applications and the toughness necessary to resist crack formation during PBF processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If alloy composition is modified to increase hardness, then hardness and strength are improved, but elongation and toughness decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehardnessVSAvoidelongation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully controls the concentration parameters of alloying elements to achieve optimal balance. Specifically, it limits C to 0.05-0.35 wt.% and controls the levels of Ni, Cu, Nb, Si, and N within specific ranges to ensure both high hardness and sufficient elongation (≥3.0%), preventing excessive brittleness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent develops a multi-phase composite microstructure that includes both hard phases (metal carbides and carbonitrides) and softer matrix phases. This composite structure allows the material to achieve hardness ≥375 HV while maintaining elongation ≥3.0%, as the softer phases provide ductility while the hard phases provide strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If Cr and Mo content is increased to improve corrosion resistance and strength, then material properties are improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidalloy composition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the Cr content at 10.0-19.0 wt.% and Mo content at 0.5-3.0 wt.% to achieve the desired corrosion resistance and strength properties. By precisely controlling these parameter ranges and combining them with other alloying elements, the patent achieves high performance while managing compositional complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method enables the production of 3D printed metallic parts with tensile strength of at least 1000 MPa, yield strength of at least 640 MPa, elongation of at least 3%, and hardness of at least 375 HV, while reducing porosity and cracking, and can be further enhanced through heat treatment and surface hardening processes.

Implementation Method 1

forming one or more layers of the alloy by melting the alloy into a molten state and cooling and forming a solidified layer of the elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

forming one or more layers of the alloy by melting the alloy into a molten state and cooling and forming a solidified layer of the elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Implementation Method 3

the alloys also indicate the ability to form desirable phases, such as metal carbide and/or metal carbonitride phases, that contribute to such mechanical property characteristics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS10953465B23D printable hard ferrous metallic alloys for powder bed fusion
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 MACLEAN FOGG CO
  • US10953465B2 patent drawing
  • US10953465B2 patent drawing
  • US10953465B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to alloy compositions for 3D metal printing procedures which provide metallic parts with high hardness, tensile strengths, yield strengths, and elongation. The alloys include Fe, Cr and Mo and at least three or more elements selected from C, Ni, Cu, Nb, Si and N. Ni may be replaced with Mn. As built parts indicate a tensile strength of at least 1000 MPa, yield strength of at least 640 MPa, elongation of at least 3.0% and hardness (HV) of at least 375.