Continuous Fertigation System for Micro-Irrigation Plugging Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Micro-irrigation systems are prone to plugging due to the sensitivity to water quality and additives, leading to uneven distribution of water and nutrients, and high labor and equipment costs in conventional fertigation methods.

Innovation Solution

A method of continuous fertigation where crop-quality-enhancer feedstock, including fertilizers, is charged to the irrigation system at low levels throughout the irrigation process, using an automated system to maintain a high-dilution environment and produce customized fertilizers with minimal nutrient-extraneous materials, reducing plugging and labor costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional fertigation methods are used to deliver fertilizers to crops, then fertilizer application efficiency is improved, but micro-irrigation systems become prone to plugging due to sensitivity to water quality and additives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefertilizer application efficiencyVSAvoidsystem plugging resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the concentration parameter of fertilizers by using highly soluble fertilizer materials and maintaining low concentrations in the irrigation water. This parameter change allows conventional fertigation methods to work effectively while preventing plugging, as the low concentration reduces precipitation and clogging of micro-irrigation systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different fertilizer concentrations to different locations in the irrigation system. Highly soluble fertilizer materials are applied at low concentrations in the main irrigation lines, while localized high-concentration applications are avoided. This local quality differentiation ensures system reliability while maintaining fertilizer application efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If conventional fertigation methods are used, then fertilizer delivery is achieved, but labor and equipment costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefertilizer delivery capabilityVSAvoidlabor and equipment costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs automated injection systems that self-regulate fertilizer delivery based on irrigation water flow rates. The system automatically mixes and distributes fertilizers without requiring manual intervention for dosing calculations or application timing, thereby reducing labor costs while maintaining effective fertilizer delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent integrates fertilizer injection, mixing, and distribution functions into a single multi-functional fertigation system. This universal system handles both irrigation water delivery and fertilizer application simultaneously, eliminating the need for separate equipment and operations, thus reducing overall equipment costs and simplifying operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If high concentrations of fertilizers are applied, then nutrient delivery is improved, but plugging of micro-irrigation systems occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenutrient delivery amountVSAvoidplugging susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the concentration parameter by using highly soluble fertilizer materials at low concentrations in the irrigation water. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by delivering adequate nutrients through increased solubility and continuous low-level application rather than high-concentration pulses, thereby preventing plugging while maintaining nutrient delivery effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous low-concentration fertilizer application throughout the irrigation process rather than intermittent high-concentration dosing. This continuous action ensures steady nutrient delivery to crops while maintaining low concentrations in the system that prevent precipitation and plugging of micro-irrigation components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Reliability

If crop-quality-enhancer feedstock is charged continuously at low levels, then plugging issues are eliminated and labor costs are reduced, but automated systems and high-dilution environments are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplugging eliminationVSAvoidautomated system requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated injection system is designed to self-regulate based on irrigation water flow rates, automatically adjusting fertilizer dosing without requiring complex external control systems. The system monitors flow and self-adjusts injection rates, reducing the need for sophisticated automation while eliminating plugging through consistent low-concentration delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the irrigation system to maintain continuous high-dilution environments. By adjusting injection rates to match irrigation flow rates and maintaining low fertilizer concentrations throughout the system, the patent eliminates plugging while using relatively simple automated injection equipment rather than complex control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces labor and equipment costs, eliminates plugging issues, and ensures uniform nutrient availability throughout the crop cycle, enhancing crop health and productivity while minimizing waste and excess fertilizer usage.

Implementation Method 1

as those components dissolve and mix, reactions may occur

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDissolution: Solvation

Implementation Method 2

the components intermix as the feedstock is charged to the irrigation system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMixing: Stirring

Data Source

PatentUS8986417B1Method and system for agricultural fertigation
Publication Date: 2015.03.24 DEERPOINT GROUP LLC
  • US8986417B1 patent drawing
  • US8986417B1 patent drawing
  • US8986417B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural fertigation method includes the continuous charging of crop-quality-enhancer-feedstock comprised of one or more crop-quality enhancers (fertilizers, soil amendments and the like) to an irrigation system upstream of the agricultural field being irrigated. The crop-quality-enhancer-feedstock is diluted upon so charging to a level within the system solubility limits and the stream of flowing irrigation water dampens the resultant dissolution exotherm. A system wherein crop-quality enhancers are efficiently continuously fed to the irrigation system main line or a side-arm mixing chamber efficiently implements the method.