FES Ergometer Personalized Charge Rate Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ergometers equipped with Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) systems require manual calibration by a qualified person, which is time-consuming and does not allow for precise calibration of stimulation charge rate specific to each user's muscular and skeletal characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A method for automatically determining a personalized profile of stimulation charge rate for each user's muscle or group of muscles using a motorized ergometer with integrated FES system, involving a ramp of stimulation charge rate to obtain a static force profile, and optionally determining stimulation intervals for optimal muscle engagement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual calibration by a qualified person is used, then the FES system can be calibrated, but the calibration process is time-consuming and delays the training phase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration precisionVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically determining stimulation charge rate parameters based on measurements taken during exercise. The ergometer's sensors detect muscle activation and force production, and the control unit processes this data to calculate personalized stimulation parameters without requiring manual intervention from qualified personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual calibration process is replaced with an automated electronic system that uses sensors, processors, and algorithms to determine stimulation parameters. The control unit electronically measures muscle activation through force sensors and calculates optimal charge rates based on pre-programmed protocols and real-time data analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If a limited set of accessible parameters or pre-recorded sets is used, then the device is easier to operate, but the calibration cannot be precisely adapted to each user's specific muscular and skeletal characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter configuration easeVSAvoidcalibration precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts stimulation parameters based on real-time measurements of muscle activation and force production during exercise. The control unit modifies charge rate, pulse width, and frequency parameters according to the user's actual physiological response, enabling precise customization for each individual's muscular and skeletal characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors muscle activation and force production during exercise, using this feedback to automatically adjust and optimize stimulation parameters. The control unit processes sensor data in real-time and modifies charge rates based on the user's performance and physiological response, achieving precise calibration without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If stimulation charge rate is not automatically calibrated, then the device structure remains simpler, but the effectiveness of exercise training is reduced due to lack of personalization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining effectivenessVSAvoidcalibration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit performs multiple functions including monitoring exercise parameters, detecting muscle activation, calculating stimulation charge rates, and controlling the FES system. By integrating these functions into a single multi-functional control unit, the system achieves personalized calibration without proportionally increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables fast and precise calibration of FES system parameters specific to each user, improving the effectiveness and personalization of exercise training by adapting stimulation charge rate to individual physiological conditions and exercise types.

Implementation Method 1

Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) is a well-established rehabilitation technique that delivers pulses of electrical current to the nerves, causing the muscles they innervate to contract

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical stimulation: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

the articulated actuator comprises at least one force sensor and/or at least one position sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce measurement: Force

Data Source

PatentEP4151271B1Method and system to determine a personalized profile of stimulation charge rate for a subject using an ergometer
Publication Date: 2025.02.19 KURAGE

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for determining a profile of stimulation charge rate for at least one muscle or group of muscles of a subject using the ergometer equipped with a FES system, said profile of stimulation charge rate being specific to the ergometer user. The present invention relates to a method for stimulation intervals for at least one muscle or group of muscles of a subject using the ergometer equipped with a FES system. The present invention also relates to an ergometer, preferably a cyclic ergometer such as an electric stimulation stationary bike, comprising a FES controller with instructions to operate the method of the invention.