FFF Feedstock Binder for Metal Shrinkage Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fused filament fabrication (FFF) methods face challenges in producing objects from heat-resistant materials like metals, alloys, and ceramics due to limitations in binder systems, which affect the spoolability, extrudability, and final product properties such as strength and density, leading to issues like severe shrinkage and distortion during debinding and sintering.

Innovation Solution

A feedstock comprising sinterable particles and a binder composition with a polymeric compatibilizer and a polymeric binder component, including a mixture of polymers with specific glass transition temperatures, is developed to enhance spoolability, extrudability, and the final product's strength and density, allowing for the production of objects with high relative density and complex structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a particle-filled filament feedstock comprising particulate material and a thermoplastic binder is used in Fused Filament Fabrication, then objects made from heat-resistant materials like metals, alloys, and ceramics can be produced, but severe shrinkage and distortion occur during debinding and sintering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to produce heat-resistant materialsVSAvoidshrinkage and distortion control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite binder system comprising a first polymer component and a second polymer component with specific glass transition temperatures. This composite binder formulation allows the feedstock to maintain structural integrity during printing while enabling controlled debinding and sintering processes that minimize shrinkage and distortion in the final heat-resistant material objects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent specifies precise parameter ranges for the binder components, including glass transition temperatures (Tg) where the first polymer has Tg ≤ 60°C and the second polymer has Tg ≥ 110°C. These parameter controls enable the binder to exhibit appropriate viscoelastic properties at different stages of processing, thereby controlling dimensional stability during debinding and sintering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a thermoplastic binder system is used to enable spoolability and extrudability of particle-filled filament, then the feedstock can be processed through commercial 3D printing equipment, but the final object lacks high strength and density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespoolability and extrudabilityVSAvoidobject strength and density
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dual-polymer binder system with specifically controlled glass transition temperatures to achieve the desired balance. The first polymer component (Tg ≤ 60°C) provides flexibility and processability at lower temperatures, while the second polymer component (Tg ≥ 110°C) ensures structural strength and stability at higher temperatures, enabling both easy handling and high final product quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

By combining two polymer components with complementary thermal properties, the binder system achieves both the required processability for spooling and extrusion and the structural integrity needed to produce strong, dense final objects after sintering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If the glass transition temperature of the binder is too low to ensure spoolability, then the filament can be wound onto spools, but the green body lacks sufficient strength and the binder cannot be completely removed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovespoolabilityVSAvoidgreen body strength and binder removal
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The binder system is segmented into two functional polymer components with distinct glass transition temperatures. The first polymer component (Tg ≤ 60°C) handles the spoolability requirement, while the second polymer component (Tg ≥ 110°C) ensures green body strength and facilitates complete binder removal during debinding, with each component performing its specific function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By carefully selecting and controlling the glass transition temperatures of the two polymer components, the patent creates a binder system that transitions from a spoolable state at lower temperatures to a structurally sound state at higher temperatures, enabling both easy handling and reliable processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If the glass transition temperature of the binder is too high to ensure green body strength, then the green body maintains structural integrity, but the filament cannot be spooled and the binder cannot be completely removed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegreen body strengthVSAvoidspoolability and binder removal
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The binder is segmented into two polymer components with complementary thermal characteristics. The lower-Tg component enables spoolability and binder removal, while the higher-Tg component provides green body strength, allowing the system to overcome the limitations of using a single polymer with either too high or too low glass transition temperature

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed feedstock enables the production of objects with high strength and density, reducing shrinkage and distortion, and allowing for the creation of complex structures with improved structural integrity and printability, suitable for commercial 3D printing equipment.

Implementation Method 1

a polymeric binder component, the polymeric binder component being selected from the group consisting of (b2-1) a polymer mixture or polymer alloy, the mixture or alloy comprising at least a first and a second polymer, the Tg of the first polymer being −20° C. or lower and the Tg of the second polymer being 60° C. or higher

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGlass transition:

Implementation Method 2

sinterable particles made of a metal, metal alloy, glass, ceramic material, or a mixture thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS11633786B2Feedstock for an additive manufacturing method, additive manufacturing method using the same, and article obtained therefrom
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 HOGANAS AB
  • US11633786B2 patent drawing
  • US11633786B2 patent drawing
  • US11633786B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A feedstock for a 3D manufacturing process, in particular a Fused Filament Fabrication process. The feedstock includes (P) sinterable particles made of a metal, metal alloy, glass, ceramic material, or a mixture thereof; and (B) a binder composition including (b1) 5-15% by weight, relative to the total weight of the binder composition, of a polymeric compatibilizer, and (b2) 85-95% by weight, relative to the total weight of the binder composition, of a polymeric binder component, the polymeric binder component being selected from the group consisting of (b2-1) a polymer mixture or polymer alloy, the mixture or alloy including at least a first and a second polymer; (b2-2) one, two or more block copolymers, including at least a first polymer block and second polymer block; and (b2-3) mixtures of (b2-1) and (b2-2), wherein the amount of sinterable particles P is 40 Vol % or more of the composition.