FFF 3D Printer Defect Mitigation via Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additive manufacturing, specifically 3D printing, faces challenges with defects such as part deformation due to material and environmental factors, leading to higher scrap rates, decreased reliability, and inadequate aesthetic characteristics, which existing technologies fail to address effectively in real-time.

Innovation Solution

The method involves a Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) 3D printer that reads a sliced model file, determines errors during manufacturing, pauses printing, deposits additional material based on corrective parameters, and resumes printing, using either a primary or secondary print head, and updates the model file to incorporate corrective measures, leveraging machine learning for error prediction and mitigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If real-time error detection and correction is implemented during 3D printing, then manufacturing precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback by monitoring layer formation during printing, detecting errors such as deformation or defects, and automatically adjusting printing parameters or adding corrective material to mitigate the errors, thereby maintaining high manufacturing precision without requiring overly complex manual intervention systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The 3D printing system performs self-correction by automatically detecting its own printing errors and applying corrective actions without external intervention, using built-in sensors and control algorithms to adjust printing parameters or deposit additional material to compensate for detected defects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If additional material is deposited to correct errors during printing, then manufacturing precision is improved, but productivity and printing speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayer accuracyVSAvoidprinting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies corrective material only to the specific regions where errors are detected rather than reprinting entire layers or pausing extensively, using targeted local corrections to maintain overall printing speed while improving layer accuracy where needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system detects potential errors during the printing process and applies corrective material in advance before defects propagate to subsequent layers, preventing rather than remedying problems and minimizing the need for rework or extended printing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If a secondary print head is added for defect mitigation, then manufacturing precision and flexibility are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect correction capabilityVSAvoidprint head configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The secondary print head is designed to perform multiple functions including depositing corrective material, applying surface treatments, or performing localized heating/cooling, allowing a single additional component to address various types of printing defects and reduce the need for multiple specialized devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The secondary print head acts as an intermediary correction mechanism that works in conjunction with the primary print head, applying targeted interventions to specific problem areas without disrupting the main printing process, thereby improving precision while maintaining overall system simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If real-time monitoring and correction are implemented, then reliability and quality are improved, but loss of time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system rapidly scans and identifies critical error zones during printing and applies corrections only to those specific areas, skipping thorough inspection and correction of non-problematic regions, thereby maintaining high reliability while minimizing the time penalty associated with real-time monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables real-time defect mitigation in 3D printed objects, reducing scrap rates and improving reliability and aesthetics by allowing for immediate correction of errors during the printing process, thereby enhancing the quality and efficiency of the manufacturing process.

Implementation Method 1

manufacturing techniques such as three-dimensional (3D) printing. In 3D printing, material is deposited layer-by-layer to create a component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFused Filament Fabrication: Melting

Implementation Method 2

Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) three-dimensional (3D) printer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExtrusion: Extrusion

Implementation Method 3

depositing additional material using the FFF 3D printer and based on corrective printing parameters generated to mitigate the error

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMaterial Deposition: Deposition (physical)

Implementation Method 4

material temperatures, changes in material temperatures (e.g., due to conductive, convective, and/or radiative heat transfer)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConductive heat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 5

changes in material temperatures (e.g., due to conductive, convective, and/or radiative heat transfer)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvective heat transfer: Convection

Implementation Method 6

changes in material temperatures (e.g., due to conductive, convective, and/or radiative heat transfer)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadiative heat transfer: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS20240375353A1Defect mitigation in additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240375353A1 patent drawing
  • US20240375353A1 patent drawing
  • US20240375353A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described are techniques for defect mitigation in additive manufacturing. The techniques including a system having one or more computer-readable storage media storing a sliced model file of an object to be manufactured and a machine learning model configured to predict an error in the sliced model file and generate corrective printing parameters. The system further includes a Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) three-dimensional (3D) printer communicatively coupled to the one or more computer-readable storage media. The FFF 3D printer is configured to print the object according to the sliced model file and the corrective printing parameters.